Now you don't have to agree but I think I get what's going on & you guys may be able to ask these same questions, whether you all agree or not (at least we have the right to choose our opinions)
We thought Lula was going to be arrested. It's very disappointing that didn't happen.
I think one could ask why the military didn't listen to Bolsonaro. did deep state sneak in the plants while he announced he was going to make arrests? or did they become turncoats at the most inconvenient moments (unfortunately pretty common).
Now I think it's true Bolsonaro could've been threatened. Putin gets threatened all the time, although he doesn't give in to what WEF etc tell him to do. I know Brazil is pretty big, but are the threats larger in Brazil than in Russia?
This is a very complicated thing, but I think I'm scratching the surface at something here. People might say I'm doing this as a cope, but they're wrong -- I'm legitimately searching for the deeper meaning behind all this.
Trump may have warned Bolsonaro that using the military was not the best idea. Could explain why Bolsonaro is at Maralago right now. If using the military sparked civil unrest, left vs right, globalists would use that situation as reason to send in NATO troops. Maintaining Brazil's sovereignty from the grips of the globalists is most important.
The globalists will use NATO force to move their agenda. Brazil is a big target for them being that Brazil is moving to the BRICS economic system.
Just like here in the USA, it was thought that military intervention would have caused civil unrest. The longer route of showing the people while exposing the corruption was adopted.
Geneva convention rules are focused on maintaining humanitarian conditions during war. If a country is overtaken by a coup attempt, Geneva rules allows the coup to stay in place for one year to see if resolutions can be worked out and the new government can be accepted. If the people of the occupied territory refuse to obey or follow the new government after one year, then military force can be used to remove them.
It may be Brazil just entered the same scenario the USA entered 2 years ago. If this is the case, expect to see a bunch of crazy coming from Brazil for the next year.
Good analysis, thank you for your input
Weirdly, Lula is the one who brought Brazil into BRICS. Which, as you say, is a thorn in the globalist side. So, the story is very confusing. If one considers this aspect, it would seem that the globalists would be anxious to remove Lula.
I do not doubt that Bolsenaro was cheated, however, so why did that occur? Perhaps the globalists are even more scared of populists, like Trump, than they are of a multipolar world. The Geneva convention acts like our three-day rule. Let the dust settle, and see what happens in a year's time.
Hell, I could be wrong about BRICS, it may be a system created by the globalists. Looked at wiki and it says the World HQ for BRICS is in Shanghai China. In the history section: BRICS was introduced in the 2001 publication, Building Better Global Economic BRICs by then-chairman of Goldman Sachs Asset Management, Jim O'Neill;
"Build Back Better" is a UN term that Biden has been using.
The Jim Oneill person seems like a globalist himself. He is current chairman of the Council of Chatham House, the Royal Institute of International Affairs, he was also Economist for their International Treasury Management Division. He is from the UK and we know the UK had something to do with the 2020 election fraud.