Yep, that's true... It's more than that. There's left-wing ideology on wikipedia and other 'expert' sources. I caught my son believing in these "Siri" 'factoid' lies when he tried to tell me homosexuality is common in animals. Say what? I asked him if he knew what homosexual behavior in animals is? He couldn't answer. That's the point. Homosexual behavior in animals can mean almost anything. The real question is do animals practice sodomy on one another? The answer is no. It's extremely rare and an aberration of Nature. Conservapedia has a good write-up on this and quotes a "homosexual scientist" (whatever that is).
"Although homosexual behavior is very common in the animal world, it seems to be very uncommon that individual animals have a long-lasting predisposition to engage in such behavior to the exclusion of heterosexual activities. Thus, a homosexual orientation, if one can speak of such thing in animals, seems to be a rarity. -- Simon LeVay.
Then there is Dr. Antonio Pardo, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Navarre, Spain, wrote:
Properly speaking, homosexuality does not exist among animals.... For reasons of survival, the reproductive instinct among animals is always directed towards an individual of the opposite sex. Therefore, an animal can never be homosexual as such. Nevertheless, the interaction of other instincts (particularly dominance) can result in behavior that appears to be homosexual. Such behavior cannot be equated with an animal homosexuality. All it means is that animal sexual behavior encompasses aspects beyond that of reproduction.
Homosexuality means 'homosexual behavior'. There is no such thing as homosexual behavior in animals unless the act of sodomy is observed. This does not happen though.
Back to human homosexual behavior. How is this actually defined? The meaning keeps expanding to where it now means infants and toddlers are claimed to have homosexual behavior. This is crazy talk and its designed to make "homosexual behavior" (whatever that means) normalized in the public domain. This as a caveat would include sodomy. The real intention of disguising it through the normalization of ever changing meaning of words to confuse the innocent. This is why words like sodomy , transvestite, and grooming need to continue to be used to shed light on what the enemy is trying so hard to hide.
Yep, that's true... It's more than that. There's left-wing ideology on wikipedia and other 'expert' sources. I caught my son believing in these "Siri" 'factoid' lies when he tried to tell me homosexuality is common in animals. Say what? I asked him if he knew what homosexual behavior in animals is? He couldn't answer. That's the point. Homosexual behavior in animals can mean almost anything. The real question is do animals practice sodomy on one another? The answer is no. It's extremely rare and an aberration of Nature. Conservapedia has a good write-up on this and quotes a "homosexual scientist" (whatever that is).
Then there is Dr. Antonio Pardo, Professor of Bioethics at the University of Navarre, Spain, wrote:
Homosexuality means 'homosexual behavior'. There is no such thing as homosexual behavior in animals unless the act of sodomy is observed. This does not happen though.
Back to human homosexual behavior. How is this actually defined? The meaning keeps expanding to where it now means infants and toddlers are claimed to have homosexual behavior. This is crazy talk and its designed to make "homosexual behavior" (whatever that means) normalized in the public domain. This as a caveat would include sodomy. The real intention of disguising it through the normalization of ever changing meaning of words to confuse the innocent. This is why words like sodomy , transvestite, and grooming need to continue to be used to shed light on what the enemy is trying so hard to hide.