Optics.
Perhaps it is the plan to make DJT speaker of the house. The optics would not be as good if 45 opposed McCarthy because he wanted to be speaker of the house.
Now Trump can get a nomination without that fight against McCarthy.
After all, McCarthy is the first failed speaker vote in 100 years. We all know Trump's world consists of Longshots.
Theory; What if the opposing Repubs is part of THE PLAN? Matt Gaetz has been very verbal about a No McCarthy vote. He said in an interview he would hold out until the cherry blossoms bloom in DC. That's usually early-mid spring.
Would the 'hold out' Repubs do so until the SCOTUS rules on the Brunson v Alma Adams case on Jan 6, 2023? Perhaps that is part of the plan.
The Brunson case was rushed onto the SCOTUS docket for early Jan 2023 review. This would remove 388 members of congress, Pence, Biden & Harris, too for breach of oath. SCOTUS has the power to adjudicate this specific case.
Would Trump then be reinstated to the presidency once the SCOTUS rules/removes the members? (Pence would therefore NOT be reinstated, as he was included in the breach of oath).
So, there may be special elections for all those vacant seats!
Interesting theory. My guess is that those staunch opposition patriots know something more about McCarthy that we don't, and that's why they're not backing down. This could be a delaying tactic for some unforeseen revelation soon to appear in the near future.
He did say "we got them ALL" maybe he really will completely drain the swamp with one blow? That'd be so epic.
Won't happen, but so epic.
From your keyboard to God's ears
delaying tactic for Elon's drops?
Gaetz said mccarthy "sold shares" of himself.
Speaker nomination 2016; Ivan Raiklin's research found he had an affair with another house member (female), he is part of the super pac SBF-FTX scandal/ monies distributed, which makes him an accessory to that crime(s). He supports Ukraine, which we all know is just embezzlement of tax payer dollars and then laundered back into their own pockets or 'charities.' Let's see where this goes. Watch Matt Gaetz commentary on just who McCarthy is...
I wish. I like how you think though.
Makes for a perfect Reluctant hero archetype story line too. 👏🏼👏🏼
You didn't read that article that was posted here about the likelihood of Brunson being seen. I wouldnt get too hopeful.
It could've been done for the optics of having leverage over the DC swamp nefarious activities/agendas. Like packing the supreme court, passing legislation that is unconstitutional.
Remember, out of the blue they reversed Roe v Wade and the decision went back to each states decision on abortions. This could be one of those 'moments in history' that sets precedence on issues like the Brunson case. Which is really all about breach of oath in protecting America and Nat'l Security; i.e. elections, both from foreign and domestic interference. I've viewed several dozen interviews with Loy Brunson and the Brother who brought this case is self educated in the area of law. He's studied the law for years with no degree or JD and has a better understanding than most educated through law school attorneys have...
Recall, Trump is all about Law & Order. And we have so many talking about two tier justice system. This could be the start of righting the ship, so to speak.