He diddnt support lockdowns at all. The only restrictions i remember him promoting was halting oversea flights.
appointed big pharma lobbyists to his cabinet?
Dark to light. Those people never would have entered the public eye if Trump hadnt brought them to the surface.
Yes debate is over. You can whine about how he diddnt flawlessly save everyone like a god but the reality is it was him and a handful of patriots steering a crashing plane into the water instead of on land. The unsafe vax would have had the same effects because as we know it was never about making people healthy. The only difference is we would still be facing lockdowns. How long does a vaccine take to develop in traditional means? 2-3 years? We would just now be being introduced to it and would just now be learning about adverse reactions.
Why did he continue to promote the vax, even after it became apparent that it's harmful? You can say debate over, because that single question, in a presidential debate, could cost an election. Accuse me of whining, or pretend to know what would have happened if... Truth is, we don't know. We do know what he did and didn't do, and reminding people of it is not whining.
Best path for DJT. He would not survive a debate right now. Any other candidate could filet him with big pharma questions.
It was either project warpspeed or years of lockdowns and strengthened petty tyrants. Debate over.
That's why he supported lockdowns, and appointed big pharma lobbyists to his cabinet? Debate over is right.
He diddnt support lockdowns at all. The only restrictions i remember him promoting was halting oversea flights.
Dark to light. Those people never would have entered the public eye if Trump hadnt brought them to the surface.
Yes debate is over. You can whine about how he diddnt flawlessly save everyone like a god but the reality is it was him and a handful of patriots steering a crashing plane into the water instead of on land. The unsafe vax would have had the same effects because as we know it was never about making people healthy. The only difference is we would still be facing lockdowns. How long does a vaccine take to develop in traditional means? 2-3 years? We would just now be being introduced to it and would just now be learning about adverse reactions.
Why did he continue to promote the vax, even after it became apparent that it's harmful? You can say debate over, because that single question, in a presidential debate, could cost an election. Accuse me of whining, or pretend to know what would have happened if... Truth is, we don't know. We do know what he did and didn't do, and reminding people of it is not whining.