Take this with a HUGE pinch of salt. But indeed interesting point ...
(media.greatawakening.win)
💊 RAW UNCUT HOPIUM 💊
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (98)
sorted by:
Another thread on here (stickied as of now) has Roger Stone explaining this move as follows: Dems could vote "present", in effect abstaining. This would lower the threshold of 218 to something less, giving McCave-in the votes.
However, Roger thinks this is unlikely because once Dems started doing this, other R's would see that a deal was made w/Dems and would not vote for McCave, so it would be interesting to see if he would go that far.
I think it could happen because the DS Cabal can team up to get him in... they already proved they don't care about our opinions. Hannity and that (traitorous) crowd would just continue to demonize the 20 patriots and gloss over the D/R uniparty move. IMHO