Question about dooming: when is it dooming as opposed to healthy challening?
KM has fallen short on so many times. He is a RINO. And yet we trust the plan because of a proof.
Okay. Fair enough. Trust the plan. But, we need some clue as to how long to trust, otherwise we risk blind faith misleading us. Such a psychological predicament surely would have crossed Q's mind. So, what do we do? Another "hold off" because of a proof?
What Q proof proves that we should trust the plan even though the results are screwing us?
And if I get banned for asking this because it is too doomerish, then so be it--for me, it would be the proff I need that this is all bullshit.
Q team needs to recognize that too many patriots are going to turn on Q. There is the law of diminishing returns... and right now the returns are diminishing.
Time for the military, public evidence, and change. Period.
Exactly. That's my point. At this point, a Q proff like this is no more than a coincidence. The enemy has access to the Q posts... this was a 5 year delta. 5 years to plan something that matches the Q post. It's troubling as much as it is inspiring. We don't have proof that these Q proofs are indicative of a plan. Make sense?
True, but among Anons there is much debate and disagreement here and there... so does this mean that there are Anons who will be left "outside" the plan or ending?
Question about dooming: when is it dooming as opposed to healthy challening?
KM has fallen short on so many times. He is a RINO. And yet we trust the plan because of a proof.
Okay. Fair enough. Trust the plan. But, we need some clue as to how long to trust, otherwise we risk blind faith misleading us. Such a psychological predicament surely would have crossed Q's mind. So, what do we do? Another "hold off" because of a proof?
What Q proof proves that we should trust the plan even though the results are screwing us?
And if I get banned for asking this because it is too doomerish, then so be it--for me, it would be the proff I need that this is all bullshit.
Q team needs to recognize that too many patriots are going to turn on Q. There is the law of diminishing returns... and right now the returns are diminishing.
Time for the military, public evidence, and change. Period.
Did you not see the Q proof/Delta that accompanies this post?
Exactly. That's my point. At this point, a Q proff like this is no more than a coincidence. The enemy has access to the Q posts... this was a 5 year delta. 5 years to plan something that matches the Q post. It's troubling as much as it is inspiring. We don't have proof that these Q proofs are indicative of a plan. Make sense?
Or the plan isn't what we originally hoped it would be,? It is said the ending is not for everyone
True, but among Anons there is much debate and disagreement here and there... so does this mean that there are Anons who will be left "outside" the plan or ending?