Question about dooming: when is it dooming as opposed to healthy challening?
KM has fallen short on so many times. He is a RINO. And yet we trust the plan because of a proof.
Okay. Fair enough. Trust the plan. But, we need some clue as to how long to trust, otherwise we risk blind faith misleading us. Such a psychological predicament surely would have crossed Q's mind. So, what do we do? Another "hold off" because of a proof?
What Q proof proves that we should trust the plan even though the results are screwing us?
And if I get banned for asking this because it is too doomerish, then so be it--for me, it would be the proff I need that this is all bullshit.
Q team needs to recognize that too many patriots are going to turn on Q. There is the law of diminishing returns... and right now the returns are diminishing.
Time for the military, public evidence, and change. Period.
Exactly. That's my point. At this point, a Q proff like this is no more than a coincidence. The enemy has access to the Q posts... this was a 5 year delta. 5 years to plan something that matches the Q post. It's troubling as much as it is inspiring. We don't have proof that these Q proofs are indicative of a plan. Make sense?
Question about dooming: when is it dooming as opposed to healthy challening?
KM has fallen short on so many times. He is a RINO. And yet we trust the plan because of a proof.
Okay. Fair enough. Trust the plan. But, we need some clue as to how long to trust, otherwise we risk blind faith misleading us. Such a psychological predicament surely would have crossed Q's mind. So, what do we do? Another "hold off" because of a proof?
What Q proof proves that we should trust the plan even though the results are screwing us?
And if I get banned for asking this because it is too doomerish, then so be it--for me, it would be the proff I need that this is all bullshit.
Q team needs to recognize that too many patriots are going to turn on Q. There is the law of diminishing returns... and right now the returns are diminishing.
Time for the military, public evidence, and change. Period.
Did you not see the Q proof/Delta that accompanies this post?
Exactly. That's my point. At this point, a Q proff like this is no more than a coincidence. The enemy has access to the Q posts... this was a 5 year delta. 5 years to plan something that matches the Q post. It's troubling as much as it is inspiring. We don't have proof that these Q proofs are indicative of a plan. Make sense?
No, not really.
What are the odds?
Date/delta match. Round match Trump "involved".
ANYBODY, including the Dems, could have spoiled this at ANY point in the process.
Yet NO ONE stepped out of line??
We are watching a movie...
I hope so.
But as a patriot I have to doubt and challenge what seems unreasonable.
Anons thrive on Q proofs with 5 year deltas. It is VERY plausible that the enemy is tuned into the Q posts and is orchestrating "proofs" .
What would help and confirm is an occasional post from Q saying "you got that one right" .