I’ll probably be accused of twisted logic, but here it goes. This case never stood a chance, but it served a purpose. Scheduling it for January 6th was not a coincidence and may well have been comms.

One was to give the Uniparty something extra to worry about during the Speaker of the House drama. While they all felt Brunson would be denied, they couldn’t completely rule out the possibility the conservatives might do something surprising and take it up.

But, it’s the comms that are more important. Why would you review a case on the very day of its significance? A case that claims the real insurrectionists that day are 385 members of Congress? Seems like straightforward comm on who the real insurrectionists are.

Here’s where I’m stretching and need to dig when I have time. Could certiorari be denied because the case belongs in the Military Justice System? I keep waiting for something to link to Q Post 2523 about Enemy Combatants, but need to find if there is a link here.

u/#q2523

https://qposts.online/?q=2523&s=postnum