What is this thread all about?
Just a place for general discussion. A place to unload whats on your mind and talk about anything - personal, health, help needed, achievements, daily highs and daily lows, theories, predictions and what have you.
Does not need to be Q related.
Was thinking about PCR testing thenother day related to covid and the confusion of is it covid or is it the jab? A solution to that would be to run 2 sequences, one looking for the block used in the jab and one looking for a covid sequence NOT used in the jab. That would differentiate effects from covid vs the jab. This should have been done during clinicals if they actually wanted an answer.
Then that had me thinking, would be interesting to have the genome sequenced of multiple people that got the jab AND had their genome sequenced BEFORE the jab, then compare the two, see if or what differences there are…
You cannot use PCR as a diagnosis tool, because it can literally find any sequence if you increase the cycles. It was never intended to be a diagnosis tool, just something to be used in the lab. The inventor Kary Mullis was very outspoken about this, perhaps why he died a few weeks before the pandemic.
That’s why there’s usually a limit on cycle counts during the validation of the method. It used to be 25 cycles but covid-fda completely ignored that one. Anyway it would start off at research level first. I would not want any diagnostic test that did not evaluate accuracy/precision/limits/robustness of testing.
So true! They had to silence him.
I hope one day people realize what type of monsters for dealing with.