States must still conduct their elections in compliance with the Constitution and valid federal statutes that regulate said elections. Yes, Congress does have some constitutional authority over federal elections,conducted by the states.
The disputed matter is of a constitutional nature (at state and federal levels) but not how Brunson attempted to argue. This "violation of oath" to exercise alleged authority that doesn't actually exist, was nonsense.
SCOTUS denied election fraud cases. Don't see why they'd accept this case.
States determine the manner of their elections, election fraud must be handled at the state level. Brunson is a federal issue - violation of Oath.
States must still conduct their elections in compliance with the Constitution and valid federal statutes that regulate said elections. Yes, Congress does have some constitutional authority over federal elections,conducted by the states.
The disputed matter is of a constitutional nature (at state and federal levels) but not how Brunson attempted to argue. This "violation of oath" to exercise alleged authority that doesn't actually exist, was nonsense.