New Bill introduced will eliminate the IRS and replace federal income tax with a "Fair Tax" bill
(trendingpoliticsnews.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (170)
sorted by:
I hate defaulting to this idea that we need tax. Our starting position should be “all taxation is theft” and go from there.
Yes. This is the default because the people are ignorant and don't want to learn.
Not to mention, this tax would be really high. It would start out as a national 23% sales tax, but is more like 30% because the 23% is take from the dollar not on top of (So 77% of a dollar goes to a business, 23% goes to the government).
This tax would increase the effective tax rate on the bottom 90% of income earners, and only those in the top 10% would receive an effective tax break.
Where are you getting those numbers from?
The 23% comes directly from the bill itself (link below).
The rest of the numbers come from a few different articles I've read.
Sales taxes typically are regressive (meaning the poor pay a larger percentage of their income in taxes), so it makes sense that this tax change would benefit the most wealthy.
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/25?r=96&s=1
Thanks for providing that info, anon. It's good to know, and not surprising.
You should read about the Fair Tax. Part of the package (at least the original proposed version, not sure about this one) includes a provision where the government sends you a check each month or year to offset all consumption taxes up to the poverty level.
Additionally, with the removal of payroll taxes and other embedded taxes, natural competition pressures would push down prices after some months.
Check it out and see - most of the objections I’ve seen to it are addressed.
It sounds like it goes on the same guidelines as John Linder's plan in the 2000s. For those unaware this is far from new. Boortz advocated for it daily on his radio show.
The FairTax Book Hardcover
FairTax: The Truth: Answering the Critics Paperback
Competition should already be driving prices down, but it doesn't really happen when all of your grocery chains are owned by one or two corporations.
Even with the monthly payments, the poor would still pay more in taxes, and the middle class would fork over a larger amount. Not to mention this is basically diet socialism.
The removal of payroll taxes would be nice from a business Administration perspective, but if it costs the same at the end of the day, I'm not sure if that gets us any further than we are now.