GARLAND JUST DELIVERED THE BIDEN ADMIN TO THE SLAUGHTERHOUSE! The SC will be Robert Hur, nominated to be US attny. in MD by then-President Donald Trump in 2017! Any questions? This only proves Devolution in play and that we have sufficient leverage over Garland's actions to say that he is /OurGuy/!
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 B O O O O O M 💥
I enjoy the rabbit hole researches, but not discovering the ugly truths. Thanks to a Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) request from D0D and their Pfizer’s contracts have been released. Contracts for the shot between this drug maker and the D0D go back to 2013. Yep D0D, not medical emergency, clever to make it a war against a virus all under the D0D cover. Contracts say the shot are the be classified as countermeasures NOT vaccines. Owned by the D0D until it's in your arm. That little trick (per in the contracts) protects everyone. from the manufacturer, delivery drivers, pharmacist, Drs, Hospitals, everyone who touched it gets a free pass. Per contract these countermeasures (Shots) SHALL not be investigated or tested.
Video surfaced few days ago by Sasha (she's from Ukraine) calling the FDA clinical trials and Pfizer’s FDA approval a psyop? The testing & trails were not allowed.(per released contracts) So it didn’t ‘really happen’ and Pfizer is still protected. 🙄
Funny thing is I don't think you can legally contract to commit a crime!!! Any lawyers out there tonight?
Best way to verify those contracts are no longer binding, is for those harmed to sue for damages, starting with the drug makers then onto low hanging fruit. Unfortunately that would be shot givers, hospitals, Docs and RNs. Seems most Docs and RNs were deceived, but many hospitals got paid big to play along.
I have to go back and look at the particulars, but in the Pfizer whistleblower case, the defense I believe brought a motion to dismiss on the grounds of something to the effect that it was a DoD gig and that they did not have to do testing, or quality control, or some other stuff normally part of drug manufacturing. When I first heard it, I was scratching my head like everyone else at what was being said. Now in hindsight, given the revelations by Sasha, it all makes sense. The lawyers would know even if other employees at Pfizer did not. This is pure evil.
You are right. This is really ugly and it has been in the works for years - long before RONA.
One of the things I can see here is that most of the legal battles to date have been focusing on entities as the targets of responsibility within the context of "vaxxines." I kept saying from the very beginning that legally approaching the issue from the angle of vaxxines was a non starter. It seems that my instincts were correct. This language tactic was done deliberately to get people focused on the shinny object and waste resources of time and money - all while the real bastards behind this are yucking it up at our expense. They have fooled very sincere and honest people into pursuing legal action that was designed to send them on a wild goose chase. Their protection is the layers of scam language cleverly buried in contracts and other governmental instruments, like EOs, designed to obscure the reality of what is going on. The fact that this has been built step by step for years is chilling - and by our own government. When Trump said the swamp was deeper and bigger than he first thought, I don't think most of us knew at that time the extent to which he meant.
BOMBSHELL NEW FOIA DOCUMENTS REVEAL THE COVID PANDEMIC WAS A DOD OPERATION DATING BACK TO OBAMA