I say it's not there to protect the retailer at all. it's there to benefit Rockefeller and the cabal in their long term mission of depopulation via, among many evil systems, western medicine and the self poisoning of one's body under the illusion it's making them healthier
conversely in a just world without FDA interference, if one marketed say ivermectin and the label stated "this cures cancer" or "guaranteed to cure cancer" that person is setting themselves up for a lawsuit, but if instead one is more reasonable and puts on the label "some users have testified it cured their cancer" and such statement is truthful and can be backed up, well then there ought not be any reasonable lawsuit against the supplier or retailer
just my 2 cents fren. if you haven't seen documentary about how Rockefeller created western medicine I strongly recommend you look it up
I say it's not there to protect the retailer at all. it's there to benefit Rockefeller and the cabal in their long term mission of depopulation via, among many evil systems, western medicine and the self poisoning of one's body under the illusion it's making them healthier
conversely in a just world without FDA interference, if one marketed say ivermectin and the label stated "this cures cancer" or "guaranteed to cure cancer" that person is setting themselves up for a lawsuit, but if instead one is more reasonable and puts on the label "some users have testified it cured their cancer" and such statement is truthful and can be backed up, well then there ought not be any reasonable lawsuit against the supplier or retailer
just my 2 cents fren. if you haven't seen documentary about how Rockefeller created western medicine I strongly recommend you look it up