Thanks Mac.

This totally grills my gits.

"Japan" implies some sort of action on a national level, by the (purported) representatives of the Japanese people: aka the Government.

"Official Investigation" implies the same.

"Japan's investigation" continues and extends the bullshite hype.

"Japanese scientists..." this is what hackjob clickbait creators do. Literally, 3 Japanese scientists would qualify to be able to make, without lying, the statement "Japanese scientists are demanding...", but this turn of phrase implies a majority or significant portion of, if not all, Japanese scientists.

An accurate informative article would use "several Japanese scientists" or "<actual number> Japanese scientists", or even at least "some Japanese scientists..."

NOT choosing such a turn of phrase evidence of either gross (huge) incompetence in writing, or deliberate effort to manipulate and mislead via word/phrase choice.

Learn to read the signs, anons. Language is like an AR15. It is often dangerous when badly handled, and can either kill or protect life.

I was hoping this was what the headliner spoke. Then I saw it was via Hal Turner….

From the article: "According to reports, Japanese researchers have been instructed to investigate..."

The article never states who instructed the researchers.

I could not find anything indicating "who" and I'm usually dubious of unnamed sources crap, but in this case the research is on going. That's why I shared it.

How many people have skipped reading it now because of your "misleading" warming.

Or do you have sauce proving it was not official?