Or, perhaps, the war "serves to bankrupt (and disarm) US" and EU/NATO?
Heil Hegel/Uniparty/"Bankers win" framing, while helpful in the past, may not be as helpful now.
In fact, using those lenses may be helping the Heil Hegel Bankers by keeping the user in the dark about other, very real, possibilities; possibilities Q and Q+ hightlight.
DS wanted Patriot missile batteries online. Russia said no way.
Now the choices are for either side to nuke or enter a protracted ground war where Russia will have a head start with armor / artillery.
They will storm the areas they want and set up to defend them knowing the positions will be hotly contested.
Protracted war with expensive armor / munitions serves to bankrupt US and RU.
US funds war through debt while Russia uses natural resources, reserves and debt as well.
Bankers win.
Or, perhaps, the war "serves to bankrupt (and disarm) US" and EU/NATO?
Heil Hegel/Uniparty/"Bankers win" framing, while helpful in the past, may not be as helpful now.
In fact, using those lenses may be helping the Heil Hegel Bankers by keeping the user in the dark about other, very real, possibilities; possibilities Q and Q+ hightlight.