I myself have speculated that what could be happening in this movie we're watching is that Biden wil be 25th'd and because Kamala isn't eligible (this eligibility opinion may end up in the courts) that speaker of the house will become president. before it's time for the speaker to be anointed president the house will use the new rule to recall a speaker (I'd think McCarthy would be in on and supportive of this speakership swaparoo), and install GEOTUS. many have argued that Harris is eligible and/or that constitution doesn't allow this or whatever. here at GAW we see real info so i took it upon myself to do a little research just to answer the question of whether Harris is eligible. if anyone wishes to, or already has analyzed why and where the constitution allows or doesn't allow the bypassing of an ineligible VP please feel free and let the community know what you dig up.
links to my following statements/arguments are at the bottom.
Obama's BS/faux birth certificate claims he was born in Hawaii and his mom was born in Kansas while dad born in Kenya. this is the one he produced to try to quiet GEOTUS. perhaps Trump was teeing up this Harris scenario back during his "birther" days. i don't doubt anything these days ao certainly wouldn't doubt that Trump and Nikola Tesla could have time traveled. Anyway, back to it. Harris story conversely would seem to indicate, based on wiki, her parents were both foreign born with her mom from India and dad from British Jamaica. so we're talking apples and oranges when one says she can be president because Obama was. he allegedly had a US born parent making him allegedly a natural born citizen by any standard I've researched. requirements to be president include "natural-born US citizen", which seems to mean she had to have been born to a US citizen without having had to go through a naturilization proceeding after birth or so Cornell article opinion suggests. USA Today, a known purveyor of garbage, "analyzed" whether Harris could become president and determined she could, but this article also seems to acknowledge that her parents were not citizens when she was born in CA. instead the article defines natural born citizen differently. lastly, the constitution apparently doesn't have requirements of eligibility for a VP, however the 12th Amendment does read that a VP must meet the eligibility requirements of the Presidency. how enforceable is the 12th A over the constitution? can Harris's status as a natural-born citizen still be challenged or is it a case of laches where this eligibility needed to have already been challenged to have reserved this right? all good questions. me thinks it's far from black and white and I lean toward her not being eligible.
so what say you about whether she is a natural born citizen and eligible? I say nay, and welcome back GEOTUS!
https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2011/04/27/president-obamas-long-form-birth-certificate (see pdf link to certificate within)
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kamala_Harris (see early life section)
https://constitutionus.com/presidents/requirements-and-qualifications-to-become-us-president/
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/natural_born_citizen
https://www.answers.com/Q/What_are_the_requirements_to_be_vice_president
as for the amendment I defer to you, but as for his most bases on his bullshit birth cert his mother was BORN in Wichita, KS. with this info do you think differently or please explain where you got 3 years from?
another aside, the Cornell Law article states that "The constitution does not expressly define “natural born” nor has the Supreme Court ever ruled precisely upon its meaning." therefore this definition is ripe to be challenged. let's say the argument of whether Kamala is a natural born citizen is 50/50 or whatever the percentages, a good attorney bringing such case before the courts could reasonably seek an injunction, even if only temporary, to prevent Harris from taking office until such time the courts rule on the matter. the argument is certainly strong that Harris's acting as president if ineligible would or could cause irreparable harm thus justifying an injunction during which time who would temporarily take the seat...the speaker me thinks
The 3 years is a result of the fact that his mother had only spent 3 years living in the USA after she turned 18. She was 23, and had spent 2 of those years abroad.
At the time of Obama's birth, the rule was that in order to confer US citizenship to a child born overseas, at least one citizen parent must have lived in the USA for 5 after their 18th birthday. Since his father was Kenyan and his mother didn't meet the qualification, if Obama was truly born overseas then technically he did not qualify for citizenship by birth.
This is a much different scenario than Kamala, who by all information appears to have really been born in California. Even if her parents were illegal immigrants, by the rules at the time of her birth she still qualified for citizenship by birth. I seriously doubt you will find a single judge willing to issue an injunction on trying to draw a distinction between citizen by birth and natural born, considering that merely by being allowed on the ticket she has already been judged to presumptively pass the requirement. That might be possible once the deep state is defeated, but the corrupt courts now are never going to go along.