Elon, responding to questions about a cyber attack: "Starlink." Don't have Starlink? Not so fast. In 2016 Facebook's "Internet.org" satellite—intended to bring WiFi to the entire continent—blew up on the pad... at SpaceX, BTW. Could Starlink provide global WiFi in a crisis? We're about to find out.. - The Great Awakening

Elon, responding to questions about a cyber attack: "Starlink." Don't have Starlink? Not so fast. In 2016 Facebook's "Internet.org" satellite—intended to bring WiFi to the entire continent—blew up on the pad... at SpaceX, BTW. Could Starlink provide global WiFi in a crisis? We're about to find out.. (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 1 year ago by catsfive 1 year ago by catsfive +32 / -1

5 comments download

5 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (5)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– g8rb81 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

No, because a regular WiFi transmitter isn't powerful enough to reply back to the satellite. Two way communication is required.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– catsfive [S] 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

I agree, at least, on paper, this is not on their list of capabilities. Starlink is now launching Gen2 satellites. We don't know what their capabilities are. They are significantly larger . They only have about 50 of them in orbit right now I believe.

All I'm saying is that musk here is dropping a pretty big flex (that Starlink could take over and provide comms) for nothing if the Cyber attack happens and starlink is not able to step in and help.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q