I guess I could have explained myself better. I am just saying that the whole idea of a spike protein is originally theoretical and found only in silico. That is why the only studies that will be found are using the same methods of modeling - and that goes for any applications of so called cures or treatments targeting this computer creation as well. There is no proof that the damn thing exists as an organic "spike protein" outside of computational systems biology. Remember, there are no samples of an organic isolated purified SARS CoV-2 virus - or any other virus for that matter. Therefore, any studies on a spike protein outside of an in silico study are impossible using their existing viral paradigm. Why spend money on clinical research that cannot yield intended results - unless of course the goal is to prove it doesn't exist. This move of biological research being shifted from the bench to a computer is problematic if the data used to develop the programs is already flawed.

What we are dealing with is an in silico recipe for a man made virus. I have more reason to believe that this protein exists as a synthetic toxin rather than as part of a organically originating pathogen. The effectiveness of a proteolytic enzyme like nattokinase on a synthetic protein would be interesting to see in reality. What I don't hear a great deal of discussion about is the synthetic lipid nanoparticle that is part of the delivery system. By itself, this industrial product is extremely toxic and could also be causing a whole host of detrimental effects in the body. It can go anywhere in the body and can deliver any number of payloads - including a synthetic protein.