this is a very important distinction to make!
we are lead to believe that some babies just die, and then "doctors are baffled".
we are lead to believe that SIDS is maybe caused by a baby sleeping on their "wrong" side, which is, whichever side the baby happens to be sleeping on when they die.
"back to sleep" is just a way to obfuscate what SIDS really is...
vaccines kill babies. thats not a secret. even the CDC website, that lists all of the known adverse reactions for all vaccines, lists "death" as a possible risk
and yet, when vaccines actually do kill babies, they don't put "vaccine" as the cause of death.
they put "SIDS" as the cause of death,
which is really just a wink-wink covert way for medical staff to know and communicate that a baby has died of a vaccine, without saying the baby died of a vaccine.
"SIDS" is what they put as the cause of death, ONLY IF everything else EXCEPT vaccines, has been systematically ruled out.
they have no way to definitively "rule out" vaccines, as a cause of death.
and yet they always do "rule out" vaccines, implied by.... "SIDS!"
is it as clear as day to you now?
you have seen "SADS" (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome)
and you knew something was very fishy about SADS.
you have seen "Died Suddenly, Doctors Baffled" become a meme.
you have seen the media, and the government, and the medical establishment, and scientific establishment, et al
not only turn a blind-eye toward vaccine problems,
but actively try to push more people to get vaccines in spite of the problems.
and now they want to ask for "amnesty"? like they didn't know what they were doing?
the day that i found out vaccines caused SIDS...
i already knew that vaccines killed babies, i just didn't connect the dots until Kathy tried too hard.
but way beyond the already astonishing fact that vaccines can and do "cause" SIDS,
is the even more astonishing fact that they invented "SIDS" deliberately to cover-up the fact that vaccines kill babies!
https://i.redd.it/f0i2ui9l4yl41.jpg
http://twitter.com/search?q=SIDS+invented
http://twitter.com/search?q=SADS+invented
http://twitter.com/search?q=invented+SIDS+OR+SADS
https://twitter.com/search?q=handmadekathy%20SIDS&src=typed_query&f=live
this is the twitter account that got my twitter account banned.
at the time my twitter account was banned, this guy was primarily interested in banning all anti-vaccine accounts, and he seemed to have the power to do it himself.
so DO NOT mess with this guy. look but don't touch, or else your twitter account will get suspended.
we need to get a message to Elon Musk, that he needs to reinstate every account that this user banned,
and then ban this user for abusing Musk's platform.
https://twitter.com/thereal_truther
EDIT: from the comments below, is this link:
Vaccines and sudden infant death: An analysis of the VAERS database 1990–2019 and review of the medical literature
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214750021001268
I can share some info (and personal questions and what the official response is) that I found that helped me make a decision:
This website was helpful in finding many of the sources used in the Vitamin K debate (note, they are pro Vit K shot but no one else seems to cite studies: https://evidencebasedbirth.com/evidence-for-the-vitamin-k-shot-in-newborns/
As for your question of not getting the shot but considering oral vit K, one talking point is "An Oral supplement has not been proven to reduce late VKDB": #1) when the shot becomes standard of care, you will never be able to get enough participants in a study to show its effective #2 They admit there are almost no late VKDB cases in formula fed babies because of the high levels of Vit K (this is an admission that Oral supplementation does work.
Talking point #2: "There are no FDA approved oral Vitamin K available in the US" Reason: The FDA doesn't approve supplements, it's out of their jurisdiction, there can't be any FDA approved oral supplements for safety/efficacy. You don't by FDA approved Vitamin D or multivitamins, do you?
Oral Supplement Evidence: Netherlands and Denmark looked at alternative oral dosing for years. Nearly all cases of VKDB were due to gall bladder issues (29/30). Vit K shot recommendation specifically says it doesn't work with underlying gall bladder issues (do they exclude them from data?). Other interesting point is Denmark switched to the Vit K shot because "Oral Vit K was no longer available on the market"...weird huh?
American Academy of Pediatrics recommended additional research on oral dosing regimes in 2003, yet almost all research done is "why dont parents want the vit K shot?" not what alternative dosage schemes work. Difficult to perform anyway when the shot is standard of care and you're looking for a very rare disease (nearly all cited data of incidence rates of late VKDB is 60 - 120 years old.)
My final assessment: No good faith effort is put into looking at anything but Vit K shots (don't think a good faith effort was put into looking at the Vit K shot either) and by their own admission and data, Oral Vit K supplementation works due to lack of cases of Late VKDB in formula fed babies.
Hope this helps.