Slapped in the faces of the poor and broke who have to see it everyday.
How much of the 10 mil went to the statue, seeing it has no textured detail, horrible coloring, no faces.
It’s like how they are trying to destroy our history of beautiful architecture and art by erecting these massive modernist cube sky scrapers all over NYC destroying the skyline and our history in one fell swoop.
I wouldn’t argue it’s a deceptive angle. They look like giant headless slugs from numerous angles, and all these arguments are being made in conjunction.
The fact that it looks phallic from different angles is the proverbial icing on the cake.
And let’s be real… you think making this MLK $10MIL statue a giant phallic F U to the working men and woman who just want to get along and survive
WASN’T intentional? Yeah not buying it. Just another phallic idol used to mock.
10 million dollars
Slapped in the faces of the poor and broke who have to see it everyday.
How much of the 10 mil went to the statue, seeing it has no textured detail, horrible coloring, no faces.
It’s like how they are trying to destroy our history of beautiful architecture and art by erecting these massive modernist cube sky scrapers all over NYC destroying the skyline and our history in one fell swoop.
If this argument were what was being posted, I agree WHOLEHEARTEDLY.
This argument is not what has been posted - we’re all just making fun of photos taken from a deceptive angle.
We have enough to be righteously angry about without using deception. That should be left to the normies.
I wouldn’t argue it’s a deceptive angle. They look like giant headless slugs from numerous angles, and all these arguments are being made in conjunction.
The fact that it looks phallic from different angles is the proverbial icing on the cake.
And let’s be real… you think making this MLK $10MIL statue a giant phallic F U to the working men and woman who just want to get along and survive
WASN’T intentional? Yeah not buying it. Just another phallic idol used to mock.