Q also said "no outside comms"
and yet we sit here day after day micro analysing every tweet from people who are indeed.. NOT Q.
IM not exactly a flat earther im just saying that there a lot of things Q said that this board ignores everyday.. but i don't really ever see THAT mentioned.
Not one of us can definitively say that "WE know" what shape it is.. WE know what we have been told by freemasons and proven liars, so unless you have access to a rocket that can get one of us to space then its a waste of time trying to have this one out with a bunch of people who distrust official sources about every topic if all you have to back up you perspective is provided 2nd hand from "official" science.
You may as well be posting links to CNN or FAUX news.
So, considering you wont convince the Flat earthers and you probably know that... You're just going to mock and belittle them?
Is that the plan?
Interesting
Imo threads like these are intentionally trying to create division...You knew damn well this would antagonise the flat earth people... so WHY do it??
We're all on the same side.
The shape the earth is totally irrelevant as it pertains to Q so WTF is the point.
Agreed that the shape of the earth is ultimately irrelevant, we do have bigger issues to worry about.
I do love this topic for the philosophical implications, and there are scientifically valid arguments to be made for many positions (globe, flat earth, being on the interior of the globe, torroidal earth, etc). There are also many core principles in physics that are firmly and objectively established that, regardless of the shape, require that the planet be an enclosed system (biblically referred to as firmament").
For a long time I was among those that would mock "flat earthers" as being antagonistic to science, it wasn't before being confronted with evidence that showed in clear ways how the same effects that people use to "prove" a globe earth work equally well if it were a flat plane.
It's a question that ultimately cannot be concretely answered from an earthly perspective, and so, have to agree that the topic does promote divisiveness.
Im gonna point this out only once.
Q also said "no outside comms" and yet we sit here day after day micro analysing every tweet from people who are indeed.. NOT Q.
IM not exactly a flat earther im just saying that there a lot of things Q said that this board ignores everyday.. but i don't really ever see THAT mentioned.
Not one of us can definitively say that "WE know" what shape it is.. WE know what we have been told by freemasons and proven liars, so unless you have access to a rocket that can get one of us to space then its a waste of time trying to have this one out with a bunch of people who distrust official sources about every topic if all you have to back up you perspective is provided 2nd hand from "official" science. You may as well be posting links to CNN or FAUX news.
So, considering you wont convince the Flat earthers and you probably know that... You're just going to mock and belittle them? Is that the plan? Interesting
Imo threads like these are intentionally trying to create division...You knew damn well this would antagonise the flat earth people... so WHY do it?? We're all on the same side.
The shape the earth is totally irrelevant as it pertains to Q so WTF is the point.
Sus.
Agreed that the shape of the earth is ultimately irrelevant, we do have bigger issues to worry about.
I do love this topic for the philosophical implications, and there are scientifically valid arguments to be made for many positions (globe, flat earth, being on the interior of the globe, torroidal earth, etc). There are also many core principles in physics that are firmly and objectively established that, regardless of the shape, require that the planet be an enclosed system (biblically referred to as firmament").
For a long time I was among those that would mock "flat earthers" as being antagonistic to science, it wasn't before being confronted with evidence that showed in clear ways how the same effects that people use to "prove" a globe earth work equally well if it were a flat plane.
It's a question that ultimately cannot be concretely answered from an earthly perspective, and so, have to agree that the topic does promote divisiveness.