So then wouldn't they be more interested in making us believe it is a flat disc that flys upward at the same rate of speed with a tiny ball of magic light and heat that floats above us only a few miles up?
That would get way more people under the control of their cult then making up with a round ball theory that actually backs up what we see in real life with a sun and moon and planets that aren't magical divine beings.
See that's the problem you attack the flat earth movement using terms akin to "qanon" and "believes jfk is alive" when you say "shoots upwards". It's obvious you've never even entertained the idea, and only have listened to the mainstream fodder.
I have entertained it plenty, just because you have shit and pseudoscience for evidence doesn't mean anyone who notices you have bad evidence "isn't looking hard enough".
What would be the motive for tricking everyone into thinking it's a globe?
If a shepherd convinces the flock there's nothing beyond their fence they probably chill out a bit.
So then wouldn't they be more interested in making us believe it is a flat disc that flys upward at the same rate of speed with a tiny ball of magic light and heat that floats above us only a few miles up?
That would get way more people under the control of their cult then making up with a round ball theory that actually backs up what we see in real life with a sun and moon and planets that aren't magical divine beings.
See that's the problem you attack the flat earth movement using terms akin to "qanon" and "believes jfk is alive" when you say "shoots upwards". It's obvious you've never even entertained the idea, and only have listened to the mainstream fodder.
I have entertained it plenty, just because you have shit and pseudoscience for evidence doesn't mean anyone who notices you have bad evidence "isn't looking hard enough".
What have I not seen that I need to see?