Jamie Lee Curtis outs herself as part of Pedowood via Instagram. Took the post down but not before a friend grabbed it. Maybe worth looking into cometpictures. Look at the framed picture on the wall...
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (112)
sorted by:
the picture is of a kid having a bath in a plastic tub.
somewhere there's a pic of me having a bath in a plastic flower pot. that's on someones wall. not illegal. not murder. not pedophilic. just a kid chillin in a tub.
I'm not saying she's innocent... but this is not evidence... i know normal ass people who would put this up, so i don't even really consider it suspicious.
this is not the time to stop digging and say gotcha.
Even so who thinks to put that on a wall to look at every day? The kid is naked and has a less than happy expression as well. I saw the actual photo on the photographers website.
naked doesn't mean porn. aren't there naked babies on the sistine chapel? her expression looks serene.
accusing someone of having weird taste is one thing. but lets try to resist jumping to conclusions without having all the facts.
It's a framed photo in an Office, not a photo album of old baby photos. Also the kid cant move in the tub to be washed, they are too big for it. The filled the container entirely to my eyes.
Also there isn't a series to look at. She took down the post already on istagram whrn people started asking "dude wtf is that about" so we cant establish any context on why a kid is stuffed in a plastic container (with no visible water in it, which makes the "bath" theory more difficult to presume as well).
Sure, Context is key, true, but its the only photo in the room that we can go on, and the rest of the space is her office/workplace (not a summer cabin), with no other pictures around. Operative word being workplace. You dont put naked kids on the wall in a big frame in your workplace, not unless you are some kind of deviant.