Jamie Lee Curtis outs herself as part of Pedowood via Instagram. Took the post down but not before a friend grabbed it. Maybe worth looking into cometpictures. Look at the framed picture on the wall...
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
Even so who thinks to put that on a wall to look at every day? The kid is naked and has a less than happy expression as well. I saw the actual photo on the photographers website.
naked doesn't mean porn. aren't there naked babies on the sistine chapel? her expression looks serene.
accusing someone of having weird taste is one thing. but lets try to resist jumping to conclusions without having all the facts.
Also the sistine chapel has cherubs on it, not "naked babies" as you say (or naked preteens, folded up like they are trash in a plastic bin about to be dissolved by Walter White with Hdyrofluoric acid, which is what it actually looks like). If you are going to make a comparison don't use an analogy with no comparative value. I get devil's advocating for things but seriously...
how does saying baby instead of cherub ruin my comparison? i think this post makes this community look very stupid. maybe that's the reason she shared the image, because she knew people like you would share half baked theories about it.
the less said about your comparison, the better. sometimes when the HEART is tugged at, the BRAIN just shuts itself off.
One is a representation of the divine, the other isn't, and looks as far from innocent as possible to. The context of comet pictures, a company owned by a demonology writer, however, puts a bit of a different spin on the image in the frame.
Or you can krep trying to compare a work of classical Christian art to potential abuse imagery. Your choice.
It's a framed photo in an Office, not a photo album of old baby photos. Also the kid cant move in the tub to be washed, they are too big for it. The filled the container entirely to my eyes.
Also there isn't a series to look at. She took down the post already on istagram whrn people started asking "dude wtf is that about" so we cant establish any context on why a kid is stuffed in a plastic container (with no visible water in it, which makes the "bath" theory more difficult to presume as well).
Sure, Context is key, true, but its the only photo in the room that we can go on, and the rest of the space is her office/workplace (not a summer cabin), with no other pictures around. Operative word being workplace. You dont put naked kids on the wall in a big frame in your workplace, not unless you are some kind of deviant.
No one has mentioned the shoes in the photo. Yet another human trafficking symbol. Just ask ol' Hanks about the missing shoes!
Lol, half of your comments are defending this post, and the other half are all deleted. Begone glowie pedo shill.
Yep you’re a pedo
and so is the artist of the sistine chapel, clearly. get a grip. do you not even care whether anything you say is true? if you did, you would speak more carefully.
Lol “naked doesn’t mean porn” I wonder how many pedophiles tried to use that one. So if someone is caught with naked pictures of kids taking baths they can just claim it’s art and they have weird tastes 😂😂
How extremely dishonest of you to say. it isn't hard to tell the difference between nudity and porn. possession of the picture in question obviously does not qualify as posession of child porn.
just because something has been used as an excuse, doesn't make it untrue. it is true that God forgives all sin, and that has been used dishonestly as an excuse as well.
Anyone with integrity can tell when such a statement is being used as an excuse and when it is said in good faith.