This relates to Bill C-7 which passed about 2 years (March 2021) ago. It allows for a lot of fun things in Canada. For example, as you mentioned here is an article and the relevant qoute:
“And what about people eight years younger? C-7 calls for a “comprehensive review of the provisions of the Criminal Code relating to medical assistance in dying and their application, including but not limited to issues relating to mature minors….” As to this, “According to Canada’s Department of Justice, parents are generally ‘entitled to make treatment decisions on their children’s behalf,’” Common Sense states. “The mature minor doctrine, however, allows children deemed sufficiently mature to make their own treatment decisions.”
So the article implies that a child as young as 10 can be seen to consent to euthanasia if they are "mature" for their age, whatever that means. But they still can't make important decisions such as buying alcohol and Tabaco, just the trivial ones, like killing themselves.
Some other fun things include doctors being able to consent on behalf of the mentally ill (keeping in mind they get paid for every person they kill and I know of doctors that are proud and brag of all the people they killed).
And another fun thing in the bill per the following link:
It drops the requirement that a person must be able to give final consent immediately before the procedure is performed. That's intended to ensure that someone who has been approved for the procedure won't be denied if they lose mental capacity before it can be carried out.
So if you change your mind, the doctor can knock you out and proceed to kill you anyways. Or just ignore your objection and off you. All safeguards have been removed.
If very quickly changed from "dignity in dying" (requires some one to already be dying) to everyone can request (be pressured into) getting executed by the state with minimal safeguards.
Thanks for this. Have a friend asking about it and typical google like searches isn't popping up with much. Trying to imply all this is not true, but the Canada website I found discusses some of what you mention.
One of the links I provided above is to the CBC, which is the government controlled media network. And even that one seems to proudly proclaim that they have eroded the consent provisions in the law. If they thought it would be unpopular (and to the average Canadian it is), they would never have put it in their article. CBC is their propaganda network. Even some leftist journalists are quitting their positions there because, even for them, their lies are too much. So it does seem like the people in charge have become disconnected from reality and actually have started to believe that some of the insane stuff they push is actually popular.
They also thought that pushing euthanasia on veterans would be ok. They got a lot of pushback for that one. So they pretended it was a mistake. Then they pretended it didn't happen, but this was after they had claimed it was a mistake (so initially they acknowledged it happened, then claimed it didn't - one of these has to be a lie). These narrative shifts, which aren't even consistent with each other, reveal how dumb they think Canadians are.
This relates to Bill C-7 which passed about 2 years (March 2021) ago. It allows for a lot of fun things in Canada. For example, as you mentioned here is an article and the relevant qoute:
https://thenewamerican.com/child-euthanasia-without-parental-consent-canada-is-considering-just-that/?pk_campaign=feed&pk_kwd=child-euthanasia-without-parental-consent-canada-is-considering-just-that
So the article implies that a child as young as 10 can be seen to consent to euthanasia if they are "mature" for their age, whatever that means. But they still can't make important decisions such as buying alcohol and Tabaco, just the trivial ones, like killing themselves.
Some other fun things include doctors being able to consent on behalf of the mentally ill (keeping in mind they get paid for every person they kill and I know of doctors that are proud and brag of all the people they killed).
And another fun thing in the bill per the following link:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/senate-passes-medical-assistance-dying-billc7-1.5954281
So if you change your mind, the doctor can knock you out and proceed to kill you anyways. Or just ignore your objection and off you. All safeguards have been removed.
If very quickly changed from "dignity in dying" (requires some one to already be dying) to everyone can request (be pressured into) getting executed by the state with minimal safeguards.
Thanks for this. Have a friend asking about it and typical google like searches isn't popping up with much. Trying to imply all this is not true, but the Canada website I found discusses some of what you mention.
Canadian media isn't really suppressing this information. They're proud of it. You just have to know what to look for.
Thanks. Yeah online of course pops up with lots of fake checker rubbish. I think I'm turning another person if I can get enough info
One of the links I provided above is to the CBC, which is the government controlled media network. And even that one seems to proudly proclaim that they have eroded the consent provisions in the law. If they thought it would be unpopular (and to the average Canadian it is), they would never have put it in their article. CBC is their propaganda network. Even some leftist journalists are quitting their positions there because, even for them, their lies are too much. So it does seem like the people in charge have become disconnected from reality and actually have started to believe that some of the insane stuff they push is actually popular.
They also thought that pushing euthanasia on veterans would be ok. They got a lot of pushback for that one. So they pretended it was a mistake. Then they pretended it didn't happen, but this was after they had claimed it was a mistake (so initially they acknowledged it happened, then claimed it didn't - one of these has to be a lie). These narrative shifts, which aren't even consistent with each other, reveal how dumb they think Canadians are.