Ida Auken has no chance of having biological children, so she has no direct biological link to the future beyond her lifetime. Instead, she prioritizes her own vanity in the present.
Now they added the no privacy part to the equation. I remember Rogan used to push this theme. Makes me think of him being controlled and being used to thread in ideas. He never goes too hard against the mainstream.
The “no privacy” part is very strange because it contradicts the WEF’s stated goals of sustainability and reduced consumption. It requires energy to spy on people. To respect people’s privacy and to leave them alone is a more sustainable practice. A surveillance state requires much electricity plus human resources of eaters and farters who don’t add utility to society, just spying.
Julian Assange talks about evil smart dust. Or something along those lines. I think it's tied up to what's being sprayed in the skies. Stuff that's microscopic but able to be charged remotely. Then, working together, would be able to inform what it detects in a room or wherever. That's my putting it all together. And yeah, they don't care if their lower emission narrative holds up as long as they achieve control.
This is what happens with you have analytical math nerds trying to run the world.
They see everything as 1s and 0s.
Ida Auken has no chance of having biological children, so she has no direct biological link to the future beyond her lifetime. Instead, she prioritizes her own vanity in the present.
https://twitter.com/wef/status/808328302213689344
Archive if they delete it.
https://web.archive.org/web/20230117224815/https://twitter.com/wef/status/808328302213689344
More evidence of their insane belief that we would actually want this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKwENH-m4oU&t=22s
Why can't the uber-wealthy just do their own thing and leave us the fuck alone?
A gorgillion of OUR money!
Now they added the no privacy part to the equation. I remember Rogan used to push this theme. Makes me think of him being controlled and being used to thread in ideas. He never goes too hard against the mainstream.
The “no privacy” part is very strange because it contradicts the WEF’s stated goals of sustainability and reduced consumption. It requires energy to spy on people. To respect people’s privacy and to leave them alone is a more sustainable practice. A surveillance state requires much electricity plus human resources of eaters and farters who don’t add utility to society, just spying.
Julian Assange talks about evil smart dust. Or something along those lines. I think it's tied up to what's being sprayed in the skies. Stuff that's microscopic but able to be charged remotely. Then, working together, would be able to inform what it detects in a room or wherever. That's my putting it all together. And yeah, they don't care if their lower emission narrative holds up as long as they achieve control.
Who needs warm homes, real food, and traditional families when instead we can spend the money on race-replacers and remotely charged nano spy tech!
I'll take, "What is an oxymoron?" for $500, Alex.