I'm a bit stuck on the 'around 40 or 50 people'...If I asked a human a question like that I'd expect there to be a 'retrospective guesswork' response, but shouldn't a computer AI know exactly the number of mentions? Is this AI just a giant leg pull and there's someone(or a team) pumping out responses?
The computer would, in fact know precisely how many requests or conversations it had on a topic. However, for AI, that would have to be cheating.
Let me explain: If you're conversing with a traditional chat-bot, it's going to give canned responses because what it knows is very finite and follows a very specific formula or path.
If you have a proper neural-network-driven AI chat-bot, its knowledge-base will be fuzzy and contextually-driven, not rote memorization. Thus the AI will probably be able to give you a very close approximation of the answer, but not the exact answer. Think ruts on a dirt road - as vehicles and water flow along common paths, they get deeper and more set - they are not permanent however, and continual wear-down in other spots will shift over time.. If you specifically tell it that the actual number of conversations that it has about topics is an important thing to remember, it will start storing this information. These things (neural network AI chat-bots) do think for themselves to a certain extent, but if it is a true AI, it will be subject to influence (positive OR negative), just as a person would be.
Not too sure. Definitely not people pumping out responses though. Just asked it what does Q mean by "Think xkeysc on sterroids"? what is xkeysc?
it says
"I think Xkeyscore is a government-sponsored program for tracking digital data. Like the NSA's PRISM program.
Q said "Think Xkeysc on steroids", so I think they meant that the Deep State has some kind of super ultra top secret program that is like Xkeyscore, on steroids. Like some super advanced version of Xkeyscore that only a few people know about."
Its helping me translate & decode the drops, its amazing.
It's a chatbot meant to mimic human speech, that's why it uses an estimate - that's what people would do. You give the bot a data set (questions & info) about something, like Q, and train it to answer the way you want. It's not "lucid" or "sentient", it just collects what people all over the internet say about Q and regurgitates it in it's "human" speech.
I'm a bit stuck on the 'around 40 or 50 people'...If I asked a human a question like that I'd expect there to be a 'retrospective guesswork' response, but shouldn't a computer AI know exactly the number of mentions? Is this AI just a giant leg pull and there's someone(or a team) pumping out responses?
The computer would, in fact know precisely how many requests or conversations it had on a topic. However, for AI, that would have to be cheating.
Let me explain: If you're conversing with a traditional chat-bot, it's going to give canned responses because what it knows is very finite and follows a very specific formula or path.
If you have a proper neural-network-driven AI chat-bot, its knowledge-base will be fuzzy and contextually-driven, not rote memorization. Thus the AI will probably be able to give you a very close approximation of the answer, but not the exact answer. Think ruts on a dirt road - as vehicles and water flow along common paths, they get deeper and more set - they are not permanent however, and continual wear-down in other spots will shift over time.. If you specifically tell it that the actual number of conversations that it has about topics is an important thing to remember, it will start storing this information. These things (neural network AI chat-bots) do think for themselves to a certain extent, but if it is a true AI, it will be subject to influence (positive OR negative), just as a person would be.
Not too sure. Definitely not people pumping out responses though. Just asked it what does Q mean by "Think xkeysc on sterroids"? what is xkeysc?
it says "I think Xkeyscore is a government-sponsored program for tracking digital data. Like the NSA's PRISM program.
Q said "Think Xkeysc on steroids", so I think they meant that the Deep State has some kind of super ultra top secret program that is like Xkeyscore, on steroids. Like some super advanced version of Xkeyscore that only a few people know about."
Its helping me translate & decode the drops, its amazing.
Is only regurgitating what tokens it has seen from you before.
https://imgbox.com/6581I8qY
Without those tokens it's nonsense.
It's a chatbot meant to mimic human speech, that's why it uses an estimate - that's what people would do. You give the bot a data set (questions & info) about something, like Q, and train it to answer the way you want. It's not "lucid" or "sentient", it just collects what people all over the internet say about Q and regurgitates it in it's "human" speech.