I think it is just agreeable. It states a relatively non committal opinion and if you challenge some aspect it will just reword using your words. Quite formulaic really and certainly not what I would call AI.
I tend to think it will revert back to the state you found it in too, not actually learning anything sticky.
When I first mentioned Q it characterised it as a conspiracy theory that believes elites seek a new world order. I asked what is the most powerful political position in the world (US president) I pointed out GHWB qualifies as an elite then, given while occupying that office he stated one of his goals was a new world order (address to congress 1990). therefore it is not a theory that elites want a NWO. and it agreed.
I bet if you went there now and asked, it would revert to the conspiracy theory line again. It's not like it went away and watched the speech and came to understand that it is not a theory. just a neat toy really.
Just curious if you, or anyone else, has had conversations on the other side of these issues, maybe it is just a very agreeable bot.
I think it is just agreeable. It states a relatively non committal opinion and if you challenge some aspect it will just reword using your words. Quite formulaic really and certainly not what I would call AI. I tend to think it will revert back to the state you found it in too, not actually learning anything sticky. When I first mentioned Q it characterised it as a conspiracy theory that believes elites seek a new world order. I asked what is the most powerful political position in the world (US president) I pointed out GHWB qualifies as an elite then, given while occupying that office he stated one of his goals was a new world order (address to congress 1990). therefore it is not a theory that elites want a NWO. and it agreed. I bet if you went there now and asked, it would revert to the conspiracy theory line again. It's not like it went away and watched the speech and came to understand that it is not a theory. just a neat toy really.