checking my privilege on thinking.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (65)
sorted by:
Eighty million citizens voted for Trump, despite the 24-7 relentless brainwashing by the media and the shaming by their liberal friends and family. The factors forming the thinking of those 81 million do not include gender.
The anecdotal evidence disputing your theory is too emense to be discounted. How many women voted for Trump and went to DC to encourage their Senators to contest the stolen states on Jan 6th? How many refused the jab, despite emense pressure? Some of our bravest warriors in this information war are women, like Katherine Austin Fitz, Dr Simone Gold, and the leaders in my own community against medical tyranny. (They are women who led our community to not comply.) I am surrounded by groups of women who research, share links, and invest their time going door-to-door canvassing to fight election fraud...just to name a few examples. They are leaders.
In humanity's past, before agriculture drew people to each other (forming towns), the occasional despot alpha male was able to dominate females, because the communities had not yet agreed upon a set of acceptable behaviors, nor had they decided to enforce them with laws. Women were not given choices, as a result. Once they were protected by the law, they began fighting for their rights. Their previous vulnerability is all the more reason they are alert today. They need to fight to keep our Constitutional laws intact. They have a lot to lose, if they don't.
I, personally, debate regularly with many of my brainwashed, male college friends, and they are the liberal, brainwashed ones, not me. They use the "shame and blame" media technique on me all the time, but I just come back at them with facts and links to open-sourced documents. I don't get emotional, like they do, with their programmed, fearful, angry rhetoric. I figure they will learn the truth, eventually...so I just keep repeating truthful facts and logic, hoping it will be easier for them to accept the truth when truth is finally allowed on the media.
anecdotal. evidence.
Don't take it personally, be proud to the exception. You're able to fight the propaganda tailored to your gender. Can you honestly say that most of your fellow females don't operate on emotion? Most I know do, including the ones I love and protect. There's plenty of propaganda aimed at males like me, to appeal to our weaknesses. I fell for the rino show for many years, supporting the controlled opposition which hurt human freedom almost as much as the left.
Well, I enjoy the conversation. I don't take it personally. I just think that the globalist leaders chose that path because they have been brainwashed, bribed, blackmailed, or threatened, not because of their gender. Their moral center is off.
But, on the blackmailing and threatening topics...you do make me wonder. It would be an interesting study...to see how women politicians handle being threatened or blackmailed, versus the response by males.
In the case of blackmail, it would be better to fess up and own the punishment and shame than it would be the aid in the destruction of our country. At least that bravery would help regain some semblance of honor.
I think in the case of a threat, I would pretend to sucumb, while I gathered evidence, meanwhile getting my family to a safe place. Since I am more physically vulnerable than a male, I may be more likely to go for help, which could be good.
I don't think women love their families any more than the men do. Would they help cover up an election steal like Kemp did, in order to protect the family from harm? The question is...would they fold and endure it, giving in to the threat, or would they run for help, exposing the threat for the sake of the country? I always wished these threatened leaders and lawmakers would go for help, rather than succumbing. The whole country depends on them.
But, in the case of brainwashing and bribery, I see no logic or evidence whatsoever that a woman leader is more likely to sucumb.
Is that why all the butthurt in here, they think the high status males mentioned are the globohomos running things now? Hell no, that's Trump. Mean tweets and $2 gas ftw.
Yay. I like the idea that he is running things. Lots of evidence of devolution gives us hope.
The fact that the NZ leader resigned is a great sign.