Well, I enjoy the conversation. I don't take it personally. I just think that the globalist leaders chose that path because they have been brainwashed, bribed, blackmailed, or threatened, not because of their gender. Their moral center is off.

But, on the blackmailing and threatening topics...you do make me wonder. It would be an interesting study...to see how women politicians handle being threatened or blackmailed, versus the response by males.

In the case of blackmail, it would be better to fess up and own the punishment and shame than it would be the aid in the destruction of our country. At least that bravery would help regain some semblance of honor.

I think in the case of a threat, I would pretend to sucumb, while I gathered evidence, meanwhile getting my family to a safe place. Since I am more physically vulnerable than a male, I may be more likely to go for help, which could be good.

I don't think women love their families any more than the men do. Would they help cover up an election steal like Kemp did, in order to protect the family from harm? The question is...would they fold and endure it, giving in to the threat, or would they run for help, exposing the threat for the sake of the country? I always wished these threatened leaders and lawmakers would go for help, rather than succumbing. The whole country depends on them.

But, in the case of brainwashing and bribery, I see no logic or evidence whatsoever that a woman leader is more likely to sucumb.