This is the thing. We are where the mentality is agreeable. The majority is with us. The problem is that tyrants can't accept people living outside their system. They will follow wherever we go. Even if we defeat them, their ilk will rise from the ashes and return with enough time, even if unconnected to the original group.
The solution for tyranny of the minority is not tyranny of the majority. 99.99% of people don't get to decide to fuck over one guy and violate his rights because they all agreed, for example.
Do you not understand the concept that all humans exist, despite what they want? They are forced to share the environment, wether they want to or not.
There must be a line where some will give, others will need. It is that, or violence. And if people wanted that, we'd already have it.
Hence, I have to assume majority would rather peacefully resolve this. With this assumption in place, comes figuring a middle ground.
I think it is more than sensible if 99.99% of 8 billion people oppose one guy, that they get to dictate law. Might makes right. We live in an era where singular people wield power over culture and law by virtue of the society we live in. This society is composed primarily of influencers and followers.
To move forward mankind needs a direction, and because of the dynamics we created for our society, there will always be those whom can influence masses. This is how we ended up in the now and here. Followers taking the steps given onto them by influencers.
Now my suggestion, is to use new tech to literally hand the decision to EVERY citizen indiscriminately. You let the people with the balls to lead influence others, and you leave it at that.
Democracy is terrible. Tyranny of the majority. All it does is allow a tiny majority to fuck over the rest of the people with impunity.
"Don't like that 50.1% of people think you should be shot for refusing the clot shot? Too bad, come this way and face the wall".
Bro this is why immigration exists. Go where the mentality is agreeable.
Maybe they like shoveling wretch nowadays just to fill the ranks. But really. Like minded people sticking together should not be rocket science.
This is why we NEED borders.
This is the thing. We are where the mentality is agreeable. The majority is with us. The problem is that tyrants can't accept people living outside their system. They will follow wherever we go. Even if we defeat them, their ilk will rise from the ashes and return with enough time, even if unconnected to the original group.
The solution for tyranny of the minority is not tyranny of the majority. 99.99% of people don't get to decide to fuck over one guy and violate his rights because they all agreed, for example.
Do you not understand the concept that all humans exist, despite what they want? They are forced to share the environment, wether they want to or not.
There must be a line where some will give, others will need. It is that, or violence. And if people wanted that, we'd already have it.
Hence, I have to assume majority would rather peacefully resolve this. With this assumption in place, comes figuring a middle ground.
I think it is more than sensible if 99.99% of 8 billion people oppose one guy, that they get to dictate law. Might makes right. We live in an era where singular people wield power over culture and law by virtue of the society we live in. This society is composed primarily of influencers and followers.
To move forward mankind needs a direction, and because of the dynamics we created for our society, there will always be those whom can influence masses. This is how we ended up in the now and here. Followers taking the steps given onto them by influencers.
Now my suggestion, is to use new tech to literally hand the decision to EVERY citizen indiscriminately. You let the people with the balls to lead influence others, and you leave it at that.
Because its that, or I shoot you till you agree.