What if the excess deaths and cardiac issues are providing cover for the enemy to take out dissenters/defectors a la Scalia or Barlow?
Gabon’s Foreign Minister suffered a fatal heart attack at a cabinet meeting yesterday. Moussa Adamo’s Wikipedia page is quite brief. But he’s been involved in the Gabon political regime for a while.
The current president of Gabon is the son of the former president, who magically kept power from 1967 through 2009. The 2016 election had a lot of human rights violations and arrests to keep the Bongo family in power.
So was Moussa Adamo acting against that family? And taken out because of it?
Then you have Lisa Marie Presley. Think about who she was married to—Nicolas Cage (Coppola dynasty), Michael Jackson (self-explanatory), and her allegations against her last husband, Michael Lockwood.
In February 2017, the couple's children were placed in the temporary care of Priscilla Presley after Presley made allegations of inappropriate images of children on Lockwood's personal computer in a divorce court filing challenging Lockwood's request for spousal support.
Plus, there’s her connections to Scientology.
Was she also taken out for defecting/spilling the beans?
There’s other examples too. Aaron Carter’s family is now talking about discrepancies in the police report regarding his death. Leslie Jordan. Fox News Senior Vice President of News & Politics, Alan Komissaroff. Dax Tejara, who led ABC’s This Week—the Sunday public affairs show anchored by George Stephanopoulos and Martha Raddatz—since 2020.
There’s other suspicious non-cardiac deaths, like Russia’s Pavel Antov supposedly falling out a window. But the cardiac ones are the ones currently raising my eyebrows…
I just feel like maybe something else is going on here and TPTB are using the cover of the clot shot to carry out their agendas.
It’s not like anyone can successfully sue the pharmaceutical companies for compensation at this time, so shifting the blame onto murmurs about the vaccine is likely less problematic than them keeping these people alive if they’re turncoats.
Idk. Just my two cents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qvDeXYF61m0
Interesting that this movie is coming out.
As far as Scientology goes, and what they are worshipping, it is reflected in their control of the entertainment industry. I don't think many anons grasp the power grab toward alternate dimensions and what kind of resource that is for the DS.
I've written extensively on it in posts that are often not exactly promoted by the mod team. I understand, and sometimes agree. It's easier to speak a little more openly now, yet even here it is not accepted in totality.
Still, my track record would beg a second look at the concepts.
Some mods here are not open minded. One in particular. Gab is a great place that allows actual free speech. You can discuss anything there and lots of open minded Christians are very active. Just so you know! I was blocked here for a week for something ridiculously trivial and I hung out there quite a bit. Really enjoy that crowd.
We set sail on this new sea because there is new knowledge to be gained, and new rights to be won, and they must be won and used for the progress of all people. For space science, like nuclear science and all technology, has no conscience of its own. Whether it will become a force for good or ill depends on man, and only if the United States occupies a position of pre-eminence can we help decide whether this new ocean will be a sea of peace or a new terrifying theater of war. I do not say that we should or will go unprotected against the hostile misuse of space any more than we go unprotected against the hostile use of land or sea, but I do say that space can be explored and mastered without feeding the fires of war, without repeating the mistakes that man has made in extending his writ around this globe of ours.
There is no strife, no prejudice, no national conflict in outer space as yet. Its hazards are hostile to us all. Its conquest deserves the best of all mankind, and its opportunity for peaceful cooperation may never come again. But why, some say, the Moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask, why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?
We choose to go to the Moon. We choose to go to the Moon... We choose to go to the Moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard; because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one we intend to win, and the others, too.