Its damning in a public relations type of way. And it will make the public more likely to believe that the same issues were present in 2022. She doesn't have a lot of ammo she can fire here. Needs to utilize whatever ammo she can come up with. That it is not admissible in a court doesn't mean that judges don't read the news or check out her tweets.
Highly likely those are from different years. It would appear that in virtually all states, so long as you continue voting, your voter registration stays active and is not removed. No need to re-apply.
16-161. Official record of registration; federal form; reporting
A. When the registration form is filled out, signed by the elector and received by the county recorder, it shall constitute an official public record of the registration of the elector.
16-162. Retention of registration forms and record of cancellation
The county recorder shall provide a means of retaining registration forms and records of cancellation of registration. The records shall be retained as prescribed by sections 41-151.15 and 41-151.19.
16-171. Preservation of signature rosters as permanent records
The signature roster of a precinct register shall be retained permanently, and transfer shall be pursuant to sections 41-151.15 and 41-151.19. Signature rosters may be retained pursuant to this section in an electronic format.
16-171. Preservation of signature rosters as permanent records
The signature roster of a precinct register shall be retained permanently, and transfer shall be pursuant to sections 41-151.15 and 41-151.19. Signature rosters may be retained pursuant to this section in an electronic format.
A. Except for early ballots tabulated as prescribed in section 16-579.02, on receipt of the envelope containing the early ballot and the ballot affidavit, the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall compare the signatures thereon with the signature of the elector on the elector's registration record. If the signature is inconsistent with the elector's signature on the elector's registration record, the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall make reasonable efforts to contact the voter, advise the voter of the inconsistent signature and allow the voter to correct or the county to confirm the inconsistent signature. The county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall allow signatures to be corrected not later than the fifth business day after a primary, general or special election that includes a federal office or the third business day after any other election. If the signature is missing, the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall make reasonable efforts to contact the elector, advise the elector of the missing signature and allow the elector to add the elector's signature not later than 7:00 p.m. on election day. If satisfied that the signatures correspond, the recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall hold the envelope containing the early ballot and the completed affidavit unopened in accordance with the rules of the secretary of state.
It would appear that ONLY the voter registration record is permissible for voter verification. Interestingly, every single voter with questionable/rejected signature status must have "reasonable" methods attempted to contact them and notify them of the problem. Even if eventually the county accepts the signature.
Pretty clear at this point that we have 2020 ballots being compared to voter registration records. Nothing to do with 2022.
Is the one on the right not 2022 and the left 2020? They're definitely comparisons of the same name.
Looks like the ballot envelope compared to registration card. One is for sure the envelope but the other looks to not be a ballot or envelope.
But there is no yr is the thing. Likely from two different yrs, at least. If they were gonna cheat, wouldn't it have been easier if they sign both.
Maybe you're right but I scarcely believe that the img she bothered sending would have been that of 2020. That's too much of an oversight.
Its damning in a public relations type of way. And it will make the public more likely to believe that the same issues were present in 2022. She doesn't have a lot of ammo she can fire here. Needs to utilize whatever ammo she can come up with. That it is not admissible in a court doesn't mean that judges don't read the news or check out her tweets.
Highly likely those are from different years. It would appear that in virtually all states, so long as you continue voting, your voter registration stays active and is not removed. No need to re-apply.
https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00161.htm
16-161. Official record of registration; federal form; reporting
A. When the registration form is filled out, signed by the elector and received by the county recorder, it shall constitute an official public record of the registration of the elector.
https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00162.htm
16-162. Retention of registration forms and record of cancellation
The county recorder shall provide a means of retaining registration forms and records of cancellation of registration. The records shall be retained as prescribed by sections 41-151.15 and 41-151.19.
https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00171.htm
16-171. Preservation of signature rosters as permanent records
The signature roster of a precinct register shall be retained permanently, and transfer shall be pursuant to sections 41-151.15 and 41-151.19. Signature rosters may be retained pursuant to this section in an electronic format.
https://www.azleg.gov/viewdocument/?docName=https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00171.htm
16-171. Preservation of signature rosters as permanent records
The signature roster of a precinct register shall be retained permanently, and transfer shall be pursuant to sections 41-151.15 and 41-151.19. Signature rosters may be retained pursuant to this section in an electronic format.
https://www.azleg.gov/ars/16/00550.htm
16-550. Receipt of voter's ballot; cure period
A. Except for early ballots tabulated as prescribed in section 16-579.02, on receipt of the envelope containing the early ballot and the ballot affidavit, the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall compare the signatures thereon with the signature of the elector on the elector's registration record. If the signature is inconsistent with the elector's signature on the elector's registration record, the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall make reasonable efforts to contact the voter, advise the voter of the inconsistent signature and allow the voter to correct or the county to confirm the inconsistent signature. The county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall allow signatures to be corrected not later than the fifth business day after a primary, general or special election that includes a federal office or the third business day after any other election. If the signature is missing, the county recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall make reasonable efforts to contact the elector, advise the elector of the missing signature and allow the elector to add the elector's signature not later than 7:00 p.m. on election day. If satisfied that the signatures correspond, the recorder or other officer in charge of elections shall hold the envelope containing the early ballot and the completed affidavit unopened in accordance with the rules of the secretary of state.
It would appear that ONLY the voter registration record is permissible for voter verification. Interestingly, every single voter with questionable/rejected signature status must have "reasonable" methods attempted to contact them and notify them of the problem. Even if eventually the county accepts the signature.
Pretty clear at this point that we have 2020 ballots being compared to voter registration records. Nothing to do with 2022.
Well, f*ck. Thanks for this. Also, name checks tf out.