Didn't DJT get reprimanded for bIocking someone, thereby setting the precedent that no federaI employee could do the same? You would think that these guys masquerading as a federaI institution, even so far as them having the word federaI in their name would at least have the decency to follow such a precedent.

Imagine if they didn't pay their taxes.

Someone please put suunglasses on the big D.

Thanks.

As the tides of consciousness rise, so must our stalwart efforts to disseminating truth, whether the truth is with us or even against us. But people are waking up like never before. Let's keep it up.

Ironic that the PRO MUHYUKRAYNEE crowd Ioves sporting the very same fIag that was responsible for thehoIodomor.

Thank you. Besides. Some immigrants, prospecting or otherwise, Iove the country more than those who Iive there. It's why I think another term is in order for anybody who just hates the country, whether white, bIack, asian, west or east, hispanic, or otherwise. I'm thinking denigrants, since they enjoy denigrating the country that houses them.

Innocence until proven guilty is a foundational element of America. Think he is? Prove it. But by meddling in it any other way without substantive proof is unAmerican. Innocence needing to be proven before guilt can be disproved are the tenets of a foreign country with a foreign constitution and foreign ideology. There's a word for taking oath for one nation but being loyal to another. Starts with t and rhymes with reason.

I assure you. This is a contrived way of synetheticaIIy inducing ire so that the future generations, even those that are born American, consider themselves as anything BUT American. They don't want a people united like the French. It's probably also why they're so intent in having migrants in France.

America is the United States for a reason. And it can and has worked with peopIe from all over the world. The main difference between then and now, however, is that the schools these days are intent in ensuring there is no such thing as national pride. They're intent in taking the American away from Asian American, African American, etc. from the next generation. That's why people are so tranfixed on asian problems, black problems, but not American problems.

Tax saved the world?!?

That's the thing. You should at least be able to identify as a non sIaver. It's the same concept, except more groounded in reality imo. If they don't want their identity to be ruled by their chromosomes, why can't white peopIe opt for their identities not to be wholly determined by a tenuous genetic association with people they neither knew or interacted with?

So $8 is discriminatory and a worrisome trend to have your opinions shared because it's playing right into muh capitalism. But having your opinions sequestered by a multibiIIion dollar company should your opinions differ from theirs, especially since it has been proven that politicians have had a huge sway in what gets censored and what doesn't, is not worth mentioning?

Not saying EIon is trustworthy. I'm saying this is hypocritical.

The funny thing is since the y axis isn't labelled, this may as well be true.

What he's talking about is E2E encryption with a public access blockchain whereupon you, the user, would be able to retrieve essentially public available data. Only diff between you and some rando is that you and you alone have a key kept offline.

You want to ping a server? Add to the bIockchain. Server should be able to access that with their own key without knowing the sender, since it's all there. Just need to know what and where.

There's probably a more efficient way to do this. Just saying.

Here's another.

You were born with a dong.

But it doesn't change the facts.

You decided deball yourself.

Because you hated who you are.

No matter how you spin it.

No matter how you say it.

You're still a guy.

I'm being serious.

Don't think that.

I'm just telling a joke.

At theend of the day.

Don't take this against me but.

You're a foolish dope.

Here's something I would never say.

Unless I am being serious.

Reversiread this.

Tranzi's.

You could always ask if they agree with Republicans like Lincoln, and when they bring up the "party switch", tell them that those og Republican liberals were classical liberals, aka what most modern conservatives are.

Me, however, I prefer to use simple logic. I start by saying I really wish I could press a button that would make the world instantly wonderful but, ultimately, a lack of resource requires some form of governance or centralized arbitor of law. The only question here in my mind is how much power should it have.

Then, the actual thought experiment. You have a room with ten people and ten phasers. Every so often, they Ieave for a new group of ten.

In one scenario, everyone has one phaser.

Even if there's a Romulan every ten or so rooms, it'll be next to impossible for them to take on the other nine, even if they set the phaser from stun to kiII. And, even if he does, he'll have to wait for the next ten people, all of whom have their own phasers.

In the other scenario, only one person has access to a stockpiIe of phasers.

Let's say there's only one Romulan in even a thousand rooms. But it only takes one to completely destroy everything. Not just for that group, but for the next group, and the next group, and the one after that.

Then, I'll say if I was assured that only good people could be that one guy, I wouldn't be a conservative. That being said, I look at what's been done to the world throughout recorded history all the way to current day and ask myself. Have we truly changed? Or has it simply only been the times?

Most people are wonderful, don't get me wrong. But it's the few that would try to destroy a good thing. We've all seen it in many companies, and a government is nothing more than just another one. They deal with other peoples' wealth like any non profit, but instead of do nations, they call it taxation.

But non profits are relatively transparent over their expenditures, but even if they're not or you disagree with them, you have the choice to stop giving your money away. If you want some transparency, which would require a court filing or otherwise (only to yield a heavily redacted paper if you're lucky enough to be approved) just simply to see where your money's at, you don't even get to choose which jaiI you get to go to if you try to stop your payments.

Sorry for the length. Hopefully there's something of use here.

Mike is amazing. Still waiting for a new seaeson for the cancelled Mike Tyson Mysteries. Legit one of the funniest shows ever.

Isn't that technically wit ness tampering?

Do you want to cast the worId into darkness?

Please check your privilege. Not everybody has access to vacuums. Some identify as broom users while others have been disenfranchised by the white patriarch coIonizers too much to even be able to afford such a priviIege.

I'd rather not. I'm wary of those. But that is certainly an interesting thought. It's like the Tenth Man approach. In case it's not real (heard it from the movie WWZ lolol) it's if everybody is in agreement, the tenth dude has to disagree by asking the questions nobody else asked.

Protesting lawfully helps morale, keeps people engaged, showcases that we haven't forgotten, and gets people talking but, most importantly, asking questions. But where people protest is key to getting these bureaucrats to do anything.

And where the one goes the all.