"We're going to have a big surprise for the country in two weeks. A really big surprise. I don't even want to tease this. Its so cool. We'll do it live here on my show."
Tuesday, 24 January 2023, The Lindell Report / Frankspeech - 5 min, 17 sec time hack
Best guess by process of elimination is that there may be movement in the effort to lift or limit the gag order on Dennis Montgomery and thereby allow Montgomery to testify on Lindell's behalf in the Dominion v Lindell case in regard to the capabilities of Hammer / Scorecard and the 32 terabytes of 2020 election hacking data that was subject of Mike Lindell's August 2021 Cyber Symposium.
The last filing by Lindell's attorneys in the effort to lift the Montgomery gag order was a proposed draft order submitted to Judge Denny / Nevada District Court limiting the scope of the original U.S Government protective (gag) order issued in the 2007 Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies case as only effective / enforceable in that case and imposing no restriction over Montgomery testifying in matters concerning the Dominion v Lindell case.
If Judge Denny signs that order, it would force the DoJ to issue a new protective order to block Montgomery from testifying about the 32 terabytes of 2020 election hacking data and Hammer/Scorecard capability.
Seeking a new protective / gag order on Montgomery would have the same effect in the court of public opinion as validating Lindell's claims of election flipping in the 2020 election.
Again, a best guess as to what the "big surprise" might be.
Montgomery v. eTreppid Technologies (3:06-cv-00056) District Court, D. Nevada
Tuesday, 10 January 2023
Submission of PROPOSED ORDER on 1236 Motion, by Plaintiff Dennis Montgomery, Counter Defendants Dennis Montgomery, Montgomery Family Trust. (Chattah, Sigal) (Entered: 01/10/2023)
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642/gov.uscourts.nvd.46642.1253.0.pdf
Link / Full docket Montgomery v eTreppid Technologies
Do not think "big surprise" is associated with anything regarding the Dominion v Lindell case per se... the last filing in this case concerned establishing deadlines in regards issues concerning discovery issues.
Tuesday, 10 January 2023
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Carl J. Nichols: Status Conference held on 1/10/2023. The Court directed the parties to meet and confer no later than January 20, 2023, make a good faith effort to narrow the set of information requested of the counties and follow with the Court no later than January 27, 2023, on their agreement or respective proposals; filings shall be no more than 10 pages long.
Link / Full docket Dominion v Lindell
Do not think "big surprise is associated with the Coomer v Lindell case either... the last filing concerned setting up phone conference regarding discovery issues and setting date for phone conference for 27 January 2023.
Wednesday, 11 January 2023
MINUTE ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that a Telephonic Discovery Conference is set for January 27, 2023 at 10:30 a.m. Counsel shall submit, if appropriate, the chart or joint status report and any written materials to [email protected] on or before 5:00 p.m. on January 24, 2023.
Link / Full docket Coomer v Lindell
You can use the links to any of the full case dockets above to monitor for new filings in the above Lindell associated lawsuits.
Oh boy, another two more weeks!
Some people are soooo clueless, they don't even know that teaser "two weeks" crap has become its own meme.
They REALLY need to learn to shut the fuck up with the teasers and JUST DO IT when it is ready. No leaks.
Apparently, that is too much to ask - keeping quiet until the info is ready is impossible for attention whores.
Haha
At least he said two weeks. It’s like a never ending John Wick movie where he never gets revenge. The bad guys just keep fucking with him and he says “I’m gonna get you in two weeks!”
Just glad I. Not a Jan 6er rotting in prison.
Not dooming just impatient!