HOLY SHIT. I just verified this info (sauce in comments), myself. Initial German tank delivery: 14. Total German tank delivery: 88. Those of us who do their homework know what "1488“ means (see graphic). This is 100% CLEAR Nazi symbolism! Can they be more clear that this is a continuation of WW2??
(media.greatawakening.win)
SYMBOLISM
"Was Hitler a puppet?" Just a question. Nothing implied.
"So Hitler was a puppet of the controlling families of the NWO?" Again, just a question. Could be a proposal to get the reader to think the other direction just as easily.
But again, #940 is a deal-breaker for me.
The second one is Q replying to the person asking the question with no response other than the link to their comment. The implication being that the answer is yes and that it needs no further explanation.
The first one reads:
"Was Hitler a puppet?
Who was his handler?"
This is Q's style. The following question answers the preceding. Only a puppet has a handler. This isn't a question, nor is it even an implication, it's just the standard way Q presents information.
And this is yet another reason I put no stock in Q. I realize "he" (or whomever) wants followers to be thinkers, but his style...always proposing questions...leaves too much room for error and/or misinterpretation. Why are people on Q-boards still trying to figure out what he meant? To me, at this point (and notwithstanding his historical error on #940), it's a distraction.
The fact that he is historically-incorrect on #940 makes it very easy to come to the conclusion that he is wrong in his other claims about Hitler.
So basically, your position is Hitler good guy and that means Q can't be military intelligence. YOU can't be wrong, it must be that Q is fake.
In the end, you have to establish whether the proofs are sufficient, not whether you agree with what Q says or not. If Q is military intelligence and the proofs show this, they know more than us.
And the answers aren't really up for interpretation. It's a method of questioning that leaves the answers obvious or confirmed via the next question. The hardest stuff to "interpret" from Q aren't the questions, it's the statements and claims that simply haven't happened yet or aren't yet deciphered in terms of meaning. The questions are easy for the most part.