HOLY SHIT. I just verified this info (sauce in comments), myself. Initial German tank delivery: 14. Total German tank delivery: 88. Those of us who do their homework know what "1488“ means (see graphic). This is 100% CLEAR Nazi symbolism! Can they be more clear that this is a continuation of WW2??
(media.greatawakening.win)
SYMBOLISM
This one seems to reference the mistake of #940. The term, "Nazi," has become a caricature of itself. You know why I think this way? Because most of what is claimed to be "Nazi-ism" today is completely the opposite of what NSDAP and Hitler stood for. That tells me it's a Zionist psyop.
Who told you what Hitler stood for? Who wrote the history books? Who won the war?
I am a history buff, but even putting it in those terms is not accurate. My keenest interest is in WWI, The Treaty of Versailles, The Weimar Republic, and WWII. Did you know there are different versions of Mein Kampf? I've compared the translations, and there is some clear obfuscations between the versions. Zionists have infiltrated Hitler's quotes, and mistranslated his words to their advantage.
I know enough to make qualified judgments. Q has not demonstrated to me that he knows recognized historical fact...especially making a boneheaded false comparison like #940. I don't have time to give something like Q the benefit of the doubt after something like that. There is too much actual truth to spend time on.
But also recognize this: Q-followers NEED people like me on board, too. People like me are the ones to call out errors, and offer interpretations that others will skip over because they trust "everything they read on the internet" without question. I see this all the time on this board. Someone posts a meme, and everyone falls into line assuming it's the truth, when it's anything but.
I'm just offering my opinion. I'm not trying to change anyone else's mind. But I think it's wise to take Q with a grain of salt. He's already proven he doesn't understand, at least in this case, history.
You think you know history. How? Were you there? Or did someone have to write it down for you to read? Who wrote it down?
The reality is that we have no basis to trust history we weren't alive to see. It could all be made up, and everything past 100 years or so completely fabricated.
The commentary you provide is precisely the reason one has to be discerning with the source(s) one places weight upon for historical reference. No one source is trusted, until others (without agendas) can verify identical situations.
Once one verifies history as I described above, it can be trusted. And actually, even the FALSE history can be used to verify the truth -- because it identifies agendas and peoples who are actively trying to warp the narrative.
It isn't as difficult as you make it out to be.
And that's the point. They know it's not Nazism. They are projecting. They are Nazis, so they call everyone else Nazis. Just like they project in every other way. Racist, sexist, tyrant. Every label they use seems to be a projection.
And I'm sure they would import a bunch of Nazi scientists and officials with operation paperclip if they weren't buddy buddy with them...