Zachary Levi from Shazam in response to the question: "Do you agree or not, that Pfizer is a real danger to the world?" — He replied: "Hardcore agree.😐" — The narrative around Big Pharma is changing quickly. Will more hollywood actors be coming out against Pfizer and Moderna in the coming months?
(media.greatawakening.win)
💥 S H A Z A M! 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (56)
sorted by:
It’s mostly all Pfizer and all mRNA, even though the Astra Zeneca, J&J, Novavax, Sinovax etc are all comparably lethal and injurious. I think we are going to see a Pfall guy to get us off the scent of genocide, democide, crimes against humanity etc.
Look out for these tells in all jab related commentary:
Do they mostly blame MRNA jabs and ignore adenoviral monkey DNA jabs despite comparable if not worse harms?
Do they mostly blame Pfizer over Moderna? They will rarely mention Astra Zeneca and J&J since they are adenovirals.
Do they still defend “traditional” vaccines as a safe and effective intervention generally?
Do they still promote “viruses and variants as pathogens” and germ theory orthodoxy in general?
Do they say adverse reactions are unfortunate but mostly rare and we should halt or pause to do some study just to be safe?
Do they say COVID vaccines are necessary for a specific cohort - immunocompromised, elderly, or indeed for those working with these groups such as care staff?
Do they say the died suddenly phenomenon, falling birth rates, unprecedented excess deaths and all cause mortality statistics being reported around the world are not evidence of causation being correlation, and we should do more studies?
Do they say depop, culling, genocide etc references are conspiracy theories and not helpful?
Do they say COVID-19 illness also causes the same outcomes purported to be jab-related?
Do they suggest or infer mainstream or spurious statistics or studies to pour shade over prominent truth narratives eg an obscure counter-study explaining excess deaths as missed medical screenings?
If they answer yes to any of the above, they are likely a shill or useful idiot or just professionally blinkered at best, or a dedicated and paid off gatekeeper/herder, disinformation agent or Judas Goat at worst. Maybe even in the direct employ of the See Aye Ey.
Comparably lethal and injurious? Going to have to disagree here. They're all bad, but you can assume that the mRNA based ones are significantly worse as the mRNA allows them to continuously make spike proteins and who knows what else that they've been programmed to do.
P.S. For anyone already vaxxed, take N-Acetyl Cysteine and Bromelain. As a non essential amino acid, NAC is incredible for many things spanning mood, antioxidant/antiaging effects, and more.
I assume you have checked the result of the clinical trial that everyone who took AZ has been unwittingly enrolled in?
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04516746
Or the recent revelations that there has been just as much fuckery with AZ as all the others?
https://open.substack.com/pub/nakedemperor/p/newly-obtained-astrazeneca-documents?r=pezuu&utm_medium=ios&utm_campaign=post
Or that AZ and J&J were among the first to be banned and/or restricted in several territories? One of the most high profile AZ deaths in the UK, for example, was BBC reporter, Lisa Shaw, whose widowed husband continues to fight for justice.
That’s before we get into why all jabs were made available in lockstep across all governments and health jurisdictions, with the “inexplicable” focus on toxic spike protein, lipid nanoparticles etc as highlighted by Mike Yeadon and Wolfgang Wodard in their letter to the European Medicines Agency sent in 2020.
Pfizer is certainly looking like the worst and most deserving Pfall guy but it is by no means the only one. If the Pfall of Pfizer leads to all the others going down, justice will have been served in my eyes.
And I don’t mean Nuremberg 2.0…
https://roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/stop-saying-nuremberg-20-20
Pfizer is the fall guy because the principles (Fauci Gates et al) are all invested in Moderna. This is simply choosing winners and losers.
Yes they are all bad. mRNA has to be worse though from a scientific perspective. Also I find it very odd that J&J and AZ were "pushed out" seemingly due to AE. It felt inorganic, given that they all have horrible side effects.