Notice how when you mention anything contrary to a sheep's fixed beliefs about the pandemic, vaccines, or the elites, their immediate reaction is not to refute the proof you bring, but instead, it's often this...👇👇👇 - The Great Awakening

204

Notice how when you mention anything contrary to a sheep's fixed beliefs about the pandemic, vaccines, or the elites, their immediate reaction is not to refute the proof you bring, but instead, it's often this...👇👇👇

posted 1 year ago by purkiss80 1 year ago by purkiss80 +204 / -0

"You're a conspiracy theorist cult member."...

This is their defence mechanism taught to them by the mainstream media...

They cannot reject the proof of the arguments so they resort to dismissing you entirely as a way to protect themselves from being red-pilled...

This is what the mainstream media taught them to do and at some point, a red pill clicks within their minds and they become unplugged from the Matrix...

Once that happens, they can never go back...

Keep planting seeds, anons...

You never know which red pill will finally sink in for good and change their life forever...

We must not give up...

https://files.catbox.moe/yr26i7.mp4

(ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter)

60 comments

60 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (60)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– AngelCole 3 points 1 year ago +3 / -0

When Steve Kirsch was first confronted by "the jab may be dangerous", he says he denied it to this woman's face. He said no that can't be true after a friend told him she lost 3 people from what she believed to be jab related. She said, but they're still dead. He said it hit him at that moment. He couldn't deny this woman lost 3 family members after their jab. This was his motivation to prove her wrong but instead he red pilled himself.