didn't they help the shop owner with legal support? that could be a compensation agreement for the recovery of costs associated with abandoned property.. after all if you leave a car at a repair shop with an unpaid bill then they have the right to sell it and whatever you have left inside it...
Weak argument. The guy tried giving it to the FBI. Didn’t Guliani as well? Turned in abandon property. FBI is law enforcement, no? Couldn’t THEY have returned it?
Hunter does, he wasn't a public figure. It's the same reason Sandmann was able to successfully sue CNN for millions, he wasn't a public figure and got smeared. That's how defamation works.
didn't they help the shop owner with legal support? that could be a compensation agreement for the recovery of costs associated with abandoned property.. after all if you leave a car at a repair shop with an unpaid bill then they have the right to sell it and whatever you have left inside it...
Weak argument. The guy tried giving it to the FBI. Didn’t Guliani as well? Turned in abandon property. FBI is law enforcement, no? Couldn’t THEY have returned it?
Exactly this. They did give him money, so it's technically is paying for it. Also, Hunter was a private figure so there is a defamation argument.
you mean Hunter has a defamation claim or the shop owner??
Hunter does, he wasn't a public figure. It's the same reason Sandmann was able to successfully sue CNN for millions, he wasn't a public figure and got smeared. That's how defamation works.
What about th computer store owner who was defamed for being a good Samaritan??