The Fight Club DVD’s « FBI WARNING » was prophetic. It’s from 1999.😳
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (41)
sorted by:
From your perspective: "I am whatever you say I am, because if I wasn't, then why would I say I am"
From my perspective: The way (process of dying) I am (living).
Tell me about the origin of no; not, nothing; nothingness...where did you got it from? Did you perceive it or was it suggested to you? Do you notice the contradiction of addressing something as "you are" while suggesting that something to represent "nothing"?
Are you SERIOUS; adjective - "arranged in sequence, continuous" or do you represent temporary (living) within ongoing (process of dying)? I do feel like a clown asking this tho...then again..."clowns to the left of me; jokers to the right...and here I am stuck in the middle with jews".
a) Infer implies IN (being within) FERO (produced by), while the -ITY represents a suggested quality you consented to. Resist the temptation of suggested and NATURE, noun - "born, produced" becomes noticeable as the perceivable producer of everything within.
b) COMPLEX, noun - "composed of two or more parts"...what if you represent one (partial) within oneness (whole), while other ones suggest dualism to tempt one to count other ones as the composite "two"?
Try this...show me "two" things that are the same, and I will ask you how you can discern between each "one" of them without them existing at a different place? Could others suggest one sameness to distract one from perceivable differences; like equality (sameness) through diversity (differences)?
c) is there really a conflict between infer (within produced) and super (beyond) or does being one (partial) within oneness (whole) imply "as above so below"?
d) why do you consent to suggested "inferiority complex" to psychological judge others, from a jew like Alfred Adler... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Adler who allegedly was mentally and physically in bed with Sigismund Schlomo Freud; the "founder" of psychoanalysis, a sodomite jew.
Do you think top and bottom among sodomites represents superiority and inferiority, while two dudes are building their complex?
Nature implies the perceivable uncovering of whole towards partial...suggested CASE, noun - "a covering" tempts one to ignore that.
Truly a beautiful mind. Bravo.
It's about letting the consciousness roam free within inspiration, instead of shackling it to information upheld, hence ones choice to resist the want to hold onto for the need need to let go.
Nature supplies; those within deny...unless resisted.
It was a yes or no question, dumb ass. Now, go on and have your last word and then be gone.
a) a quest implies want for suggested outcome, which tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable origin.
b) yes vs no represents a conflict of reason, shaped by wanting or not wanting suggested information, while ignoring the need to adapt to perceivable inspiration.
Aka the perceivable ever-changing moment aka the momentum of ongoing flow for the temporary form within aka the enacting balance for each ones reacting free will of choice.
Suggested progressivism; tempting towards outcome, instead of being the resistance within the process of dying.
...can only be spoken within everlasting sound.
Where could energy go? If being implies as the inherent/internal power of energy, then changing to different positions as partials, still implies within the same whole.