The 2nd paragraph, in bold, in his article, from the filing, clearly says the the (covid mRNA) stuff submitted for testing isn't designed to work that way (gene altering), but because some of their other mRNA stuff is designed to work that way, the 2 may be confused and the confusing that they are both gene altering may cause more regulatory work. It does not say the covid mRNA jab is gene altering. It may be, it may not be, but the piece quoted in the the substack does not say it is. In this case, the conclusion he has drawn, (that it is gene altering), can not be drawn from the sources he's quoted.