Fair enough. I think with the Holocaust, there’s been so much amplification of the event that many people who are called “deniers” are more questioning the Hollywoodization of it all. Things like the difference between the original Red Cross numbers and the current figure. One interesting explanation I read is that newspapers and history books originally stated that six million Jewish People were “displaced” by the events of WW2, and eventually that turned into six million “killed”, because it made for a better story. But even thinking how this one genocide, out of many genocides in human history, has its own unique title - “The Holocaust” - already suggests there is some propagandistic manipulation going on. I do think it’s fairly undeniable that there was certainly oppression and unfair discrimation of Jewish People under Nazi Germany, and that innocent people were caught up in that, so the victim is there, but it seems like the victim narrative has to be amplified, and that starts to be questionable, especially when poking holes in that amplification is made illegal in certain countries. It reminds me of how the corporate media did the same thing with Covid deaths and how anyone who questioned that was dismissed as evil by society. I also think Hitler was funded by the Rothschilds, so promoting him as some kind of hero is equally inaccurate. Overally my issue is that if there ARE historical deceptions going on, and various grifters exploiting for their own gain, how do we talk about this without being dismissed or censored for “spreading hate”?