A mod's life is full of difficult judgement calls. Did we make the right decision with that one post? Were we too harsh, perma-banning that one troll? Here's a real quandary... Did we go too far, perma-banning u/Blind-fury? I will happily allow him back if you guys want him! Thoughts?
(media.greatawakening.win)
🚥 NIGHT CREW 🚥
So, like youtube, we are banning based on subject matter? If people think flat earth positions are weak, simply argue the point. Argue based on empirical findings, and not ad hominem or the fallacy of appealing to authortiy...we know how that turned out for the vaxxed..
THIS IS THE PUBLIC FACE OF THE Q MOVEMENT.
Wanna debate flat earth? They have their own WIN. Do it there. Disagree with that statement? Then I would remind you that:
THIS IS THE PUBLIC FACE OF THE Q MOVEMENT.
Take that dogshit bullshit fuckwit CIA fucktardery elsewhere.
Yeah but were his comments in response to something that had proper context to the matter? Or was he just throwing it out there willy nilly with no rhyme or reason. If it's the former I think this argument is weak. There's all kinds of posts on this forum that aren't 100% Q related. Now if he's just making a bunch of flat earth threads and derailing other topics with it then I think that is reasonable.
DEDUCE YOUR ANSWER FROM HIS MODMAIL:
I await your answer.
Just like the posted screenshot of out of context mod mail from Evspra? 🤔