Ok, 2 things I know of lead credence to HAARP and the potential feasibility for the manipulation of earth quakes.
First, HAARP can and is used to guide "or steer" large rotating storm systems. I have seen it demonstrated in small scale controlled laboratory conditions and it's actually very simple to create high or low pressure systems. HAARP absolutely has the ability and there is military literature on it.
HAARP uses intense high powered RF from large arrays focused into a single point in the ionosphere, which does make a bulge in the ionosphere, when abruptly turned off the ionosphere snaps back into place and actually creates a reverse bulge, which is how it can nudge massive cyclone one way or the other. It's actually not rocket science.
HAARP, also can act as ground penetratingly radar, it bounces a focused signal off of the ionosphere back into the ground or sea, which is also how signals can be sent to submarines.
Now when it comes to earthquakes, one of the things Nichola Tesla figured out was the mass destruction that can be caused by the reverse use of sympathetic resonance principle called destructive interference. We've all seen the video of the huge suspension bridge that blew itself to pieces because the wind at the right angle and speed made a sound vibration at just the perfect wave length to cause destructive interference with the suspension cables and decking's construction.
RF (radio frequency) is just electromagnetic waves and we can choose the vibration speed or wavelength to transmit or receive.
In the case of HAARP, we know it can transmit at various frequencies, we know it can penetrate soil and water and if the resonance of the earth's fault line or plate is known, the HAARP can easily send an RF signal at the correct wavelength to cause destructive interference with the natural resonance of the earth at a specific point and depth.
Again, none of this is rocket science there is tons of documentation on the subject but I just got home from work and don't feel like doing everyone's homework for them.
First, HAARP can and is used to guide "or steer" large rotating storm systems. I have seen it demonstrated in small scale controlled laboratory conditions and it's actually very simple to create high or low pressure systems.
Really. Where? When? How large was this small scale? Who demonstrated it? How was the demonstration held? Who was in attendance? How was success and/or failure measured? Where are the results published?
HAARP absolutely has the ability and there is military literature on it.
Really. Please point me to a link of this literature. I would love to read it.
One hundred years nearly to the minute of the end of the first World War.
So what? If someone were using some weird ass weapon or doing a proof of concept for it, why the fuck would they tip themselves off by timing it to line up with a historical event? Guess what? Sometimes shit just happens whenever. If you look hard enough you can find a wonky coincidental timing with just about any major event in the world. But that doesn't mean you've uncovered some uber secret. It very possibly just means you've been down in the hole for too long.
First, HAARP can and is used to guide "or steer" large rotating storm systems
Prove this. Give me something to investigate. Don't just say this. This is dogshit without something to go on.
HAARP uses intense high powered RF from large arrays focused into a single point in the ionosphere
Great, explain the energy budget.
the reverse use of sympathetic resonance principle called destructive interference
Go deep. Explain this. Provide papers, PDFs, youtube videos. I'm OK with spending MONTHS on this, but, give me what I need to understand this. Otherwise, this is just yakkity bullshit (sorry to come off as so crucial).
we know it can transmit at various frequencies
OK, which ones
Again, none of this is rocket science there is tons of documentation on the subject but I just got home from work and don't feel like doing everyone's homework for them.
Oh? Just home from work, are you? WELL, get settled on in, hey, and drop us a note when you're comfy, sport, OK? Right, you will be back on GAW when you're ready to do exactly that. I have permanently removed your account, pending your reply. Pls use modmail
"I'm not here to do someone's homework for them" NO, YES, YOU ARE. We all are. That's what "here" is. GAW is an elite research board, not a digital daycare for low effort skaters. That attitude, above, will get someone moved to the sidelines ALL DAY. This is not a game. Hit the Q telegram groups if you're not here to work. The mod team answers only to our highest effort posters and we have absolutely no hesitation to "de-clutter" the board.
C5 is providing the discipline we currently lack as a group to cite resources when making claims.
Harsh? Possibly, what else will get people's attention to the problem at hand?
imho it goes deeper than just HAARP, it's about efforts to undermine GAW.
PDW was easily inundated with yahoo's to subvert it, we have a much stricter code of conduct here, so it's that much harder to subvert, it needs to be subtle.
With that in mind, how do the mods identify and tell the difference between a well-meaning frog and a schill sent to disrupt us?
Is this level of scrutiny going to be applied next time someone on this site claims Hillary or Barr or Hunter is in fact a white hat or that arrests are going to be made on a certain date?
This whole site is based on wild speculation. How many times has there been a stickied post calling for some very very highly unlikely event to take place with no pdfs, scientific papers or anything to back it up with the exception of a Mickey watch or other twitter pic? Just cause you disagree with the person doesn't mean they are a bad actor.
Seed the clouds with radio reflective particles the size of dust motes, the water in the clouds condenses around them to make rain, so the whole cloud system can be steered by pulses of RF beams. Spin them round to make them stronger and steer them to wherever you want. It take a lot of infrastructure to do this, expensive infrastructure.
Ok, 2 things I know of lead credence to HAARP and the potential feasibility for the manipulation of earth quakes.
First, HAARP can and is used to guide "or steer" large rotating storm systems. I have seen it demonstrated in small scale controlled laboratory conditions and it's actually very simple to create high or low pressure systems. HAARP absolutely has the ability and there is military literature on it.
HAARP uses intense high powered RF from large arrays focused into a single point in the ionosphere, which does make a bulge in the ionosphere, when abruptly turned off the ionosphere snaps back into place and actually creates a reverse bulge, which is how it can nudge massive cyclone one way or the other. It's actually not rocket science.
HAARP, also can act as ground penetratingly radar, it bounces a focused signal off of the ionosphere back into the ground or sea, which is also how signals can be sent to submarines.
Now when it comes to earthquakes, one of the things Nichola Tesla figured out was the mass destruction that can be caused by the reverse use of sympathetic resonance principle called destructive interference. We've all seen the video of the huge suspension bridge that blew itself to pieces because the wind at the right angle and speed made a sound vibration at just the perfect wave length to cause destructive interference with the suspension cables and decking's construction.
RF (radio frequency) is just electromagnetic waves and we can choose the vibration speed or wavelength to transmit or receive.
In the case of HAARP, we know it can transmit at various frequencies, we know it can penetrate soil and water and if the resonance of the earth's fault line or plate is known, the HAARP can easily send an RF signal at the correct wavelength to cause destructive interference with the natural resonance of the earth at a specific point and depth.
Again, none of this is rocket science there is tons of documentation on the subject but I just got home from work and don't feel like doing everyone's homework for them.
Really. Where? When? How large was this small scale? Who demonstrated it? How was the demonstration held? Who was in attendance? How was success and/or failure measured? Where are the results published?
Really. Please point me to a link of this literature. I would love to read it.
Whats this all about?
https://curiosmos.com/our-planet-rang-like-a-bell-for-20-minutes-and-scientists-dont-know-why/
One hundred years nearly to the minute of the end of the first World War.
It was very likely the birth of an underwater volcano.
https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/strange-waves-rippled-around-earth-may-know-why
So what? If someone were using some weird ass weapon or doing a proof of concept for it, why the fuck would they tip themselves off by timing it to line up with a historical event? Guess what? Sometimes shit just happens whenever. If you look hard enough you can find a wonky coincidental timing with just about any major event in the world. But that doesn't mean you've uncovered some uber secret. It very possibly just means you've been down in the hole for too long.
Down the hole for too long? Not possible, but if you go around believing Nat Geographic you need to wake up.
PS, there was no underwater volcano.
"and scientists don't know why"
Prove this. Give me something to investigate. Don't just say this. This is dogshit without something to go on.
Great, explain the energy budget.
Go deep. Explain this. Provide papers, PDFs, youtube videos. I'm OK with spending MONTHS on this, but, give me what I need to understand this. Otherwise, this is just yakkity bullshit (sorry to come off as so crucial).
OK, which ones
Oh? Just home from work, are you? WELL, get settled on in, hey, and drop us a note when you're comfy, sport, OK? Right, you will be back on GAW when you're ready to do exactly that. I have permanently removed your account, pending your reply. Pls use modmail
I'm not joking around
C5
Huh? Did you just remove this dude's account because you haven't received his response citing his sources yet? What the heck?!?
"I'm not here to do someone's homework for them" NO, YES, YOU ARE. We all are. That's what "here" is. GAW is an elite research board, not a digital daycare for low effort skaters. That attitude, above, will get someone moved to the sidelines ALL DAY. This is not a game. Hit the Q telegram groups if you're not here to work. The mod team answers only to our highest effort posters and we have absolutely no hesitation to "de-clutter" the board.
C5 is providing the discipline we currently lack as a group to cite resources when making claims.
Harsh? Possibly, what else will get people's attention to the problem at hand?
imho it goes deeper than just HAARP, it's about efforts to undermine GAW.
PDW was easily inundated with yahoo's to subvert it, we have a much stricter code of conduct here, so it's that much harder to subvert, it needs to be subtle.
With that in mind, how do the mods identify and tell the difference between a well-meaning frog and a schill sent to disrupt us?
THAT is literally insane!
Is this level of scrutiny going to be applied next time someone on this site claims Hillary or Barr or Hunter is in fact a white hat or that arrests are going to be made on a certain date?
This whole site is based on wild speculation. How many times has there been a stickied post calling for some very very highly unlikely event to take place with no pdfs, scientific papers or anything to back it up with the exception of a Mickey watch or other twitter pic? Just cause you disagree with the person doesn't mean they are a bad actor.
Yes.
Making cyclones is a proven science.
Seed the clouds with radio reflective particles the size of dust motes, the water in the clouds condenses around them to make rain, so the whole cloud system can be steered by pulses of RF beams. Spin them round to make them stronger and steer them to wherever you want. It take a lot of infrastructure to do this, expensive infrastructure.