C5 is providing the discipline we currently lack as a group to cite resources when making claims.
Harsh? Possibly, what else will get people's attention to the problem at hand?
imho it goes deeper than just HAARP, it's about efforts to undermine GAW.
PDW was easily inundated with yahoo's to subvert it, we have a much stricter code of conduct here, so it's that much harder to subvert, it needs to be subtle.
With that in mind, how do the mods identify and tell the difference between a well-meaning frog and a schill sent to disrupt us?
C5 is providing the discipline we currently lack as a group to cite resources when making claims.
Harsh? Possibly, what else will get people's attention to the problem at hand?
imho it goes deeper than just HAARP, it's about efforts to undermine GAW.
PDW was easily inundated with yahoo's to subvert it, we have a much stricter code of conduct here, so it's that much harder to subvert, it needs to be subtle.
With that in mind, how do the mods identify and tell the difference between a well-meaning frog and a schill sent to disrupt us?