Can we chat about something? GAW believes in science, right? We all saw how "trust teh science" got taken over by the MSM/vax cartel. And we used real, actual science to defeat that monster. But do we rely on science in all of the things we believe? Here's an example: - The Great Awakening

Can we chat about something? GAW believes in science, right? We all saw how "trust teh science" got taken over by the MSM/vax cartel. And we used real, actual science to defeat that monster. But do we rely on science in all of the things we believe? Here's an example: (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 1 year ago by catsfive 1 year ago by catsfive +240 / -4

261 comments download

261 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (261)

sorted by:

▲ 6 ▼

– DeathRayDesigner 6 points 1 year ago +8 / -2

I started my career in munitions...to learn that reality will go "boom" despite what my preferences might be. Science is the act of finding the truth, despite our wishes about it. It is not just a long, dreamy ride through the land of bias confirmation.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 2 ▼

– TheSparrow 2 points 1 year ago +2 / -0

Thank you. The crystal healing style nonsense some GAW posters makes me borderline blackpilled about the ongoing reliability of this site. Glad some sanity remains.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– DeathRayDesigner 1 point 1 year ago +2 / -1

Ditto. But I am realizing that sanity will prevail only if it is willing to fight for truth and reason. "Stupid" is not our friend.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q