HAARP is a convenient known energy projecting machine - so people are tempted to use that moniker when in all likelihood the real mechanism (if it is such) is a secret capability and totally separate from HAARP
I dont think it is HAARP either and would expect the energy to be delivered as low frequency not high
The energy budget to trigger an earthquake is not the same as the energy released from the earthquake. An analogy would be a jenga tower (or pile of rocks) which has in its arrangement a potential energy. To tip the tower or vibrate the pile of gravel would involve only a small amount of energy, but the clattering collapse would release much more than that.
Here is an idea for how you "secretly" get energy to focus on a point:
a) you perturb three locations with some energy wave that is amplitude-wise within the bounds of normal background energy, but frequency-wise it is novel.
b) at some other point the energy waves you created will intefere
c) the resultant energy from the interferences from the original three perturbations will result in most areas as a cancelling-out but equidistant from the three will be a location where the energies sum together
d) an analogy is dropping three stones in a lake, if you know the relative entry points, and the mass and shape of the stones to sufficient degree you would be able to predict the location of a relatively large "spike" of a wave, in this case it would look like a smoothed triangular pyramid standing-wave which would then invert iteself and look like a relatively deep "pocket" in the water.
e) this crescendo wave would seem to "suddenly appear" but the cause would be the three stones you threw into the lake
f) if the lake water was already choppy on the surface it is possible the rings of wave coming off the stones would be undetectable but the nature of waves is that the crescendo wave would STILL appear in the centre of the lake
So we can envision thousands of stones being precisely dropped into the lake, and mathmatically the location of the crescendo could be predicted.
Furthermore The Earth is a globe, so the crescendo effect could be sub-surface and undetectable but could be focussed on a geological fault (or perhaps they are so common you could range around underground until you found one by chance) under the target
This small amount of energy could then be sufficient to trigger the release of the potential energy stored in the formation of rock, using many many convergent waves, each alone undetectable and subsurface, to meet at a location, and hey presto - trigger an earthquake
So, while I take the point about HAARP, I can imagine the mechanism at play, so I am inclined to think it possible
I would say some things in response to this:
HAARP is a convenient known energy projecting machine - so people are tempted to use that moniker when in all likelihood the real mechanism (if it is such) is a secret capability and totally separate from HAARP
I dont think it is HAARP either and would expect the energy to be delivered as low frequency not high
The energy budget to trigger an earthquake is not the same as the energy released from the earthquake. An analogy would be a jenga tower (or pile of rocks) which has in its arrangement a potential energy. To tip the tower or vibrate the pile of gravel would involve only a small amount of energy, but the clattering collapse would release much more than that.
Here is an idea for how you "secretly" get energy to focus on a point: a) you perturb three locations with some energy wave that is amplitude-wise within the bounds of normal background energy, but frequency-wise it is novel. b) at some other point the energy waves you created will intefere c) the resultant energy from the interferences from the original three perturbations will result in most areas as a cancelling-out but equidistant from the three will be a location where the energies sum together d) an analogy is dropping three stones in a lake, if you know the relative entry points, and the mass and shape of the stones to sufficient degree you would be able to predict the location of a relatively large "spike" of a wave, in this case it would look like a smoothed triangular pyramid standing-wave which would then invert iteself and look like a relatively deep "pocket" in the water. e) this crescendo wave would seem to "suddenly appear" but the cause would be the three stones you threw into the lake f) if the lake water was already choppy on the surface it is possible the rings of wave coming off the stones would be undetectable but the nature of waves is that the crescendo wave would STILL appear in the centre of the lake
So we can envision thousands of stones being precisely dropped into the lake, and mathmatically the location of the crescendo could be predicted.
Furthermore The Earth is a globe, so the crescendo effect could be sub-surface and undetectable but could be focussed on a geological fault (or perhaps they are so common you could range around underground until you found one by chance) under the target
This small amount of energy could then be sufficient to trigger the release of the potential energy stored in the formation of rock, using many many convergent waves, each alone undetectable and subsurface, to meet at a location, and hey presto - trigger an earthquake
So, while I take the point about HAARP, I can imagine the mechanism at play, so I am inclined to think it possible
Thoughts?