Respectfully, you don't know that, I don't know that, and we, the public, don't know that. Hell, even the railroad employee might not know that (he be might just as in the dark as the rest of us about the track condition). We also don't know if the bearings you mentioned were intentionally sabotaged. We only know the official narrative and what you, random internet stranger, claim some railroad employee told your son. Frankly, after the last several years, there isn't a whole lot of reason to trust any of those things and with very good reason. I see zero reason to go, "Oh okay, well I guess we should dismiss the idea that the train was intentionally sabotaged over farmland and totally go with this random stranger's explanation that the bearings just happened to break in an extremely inconvenient place." That's just not happening, and if your son is indeed "based and reads this site," then he'll understand this position.
Respectfully, you don't know that, I don't know that, and we, the public, don't know that. Hell, even the railroad employee might not know that (he be might just as in the dark as the rest of us about the track condition). We also don't know if the bearings you mentioned were intentionally sabotaged. We only know the official narrative and what you, random internet stranger, claim some railroad employee told your son. Frankly, after the last several years, there isn't a whole lot of reason to trust any of those things and with very good reason. I see zero reason to go, "Oh okay, well I guess we should dismiss the idea that the train was intentionally sabotaged over farmland and totally go with this random stranger's explanation that the bearings just happened to break in an extremely inconvenient place." That's just not happening, and if your son is indeed "based and reads this site," then he'll understand this position.