The headline reads: scientific review confirms doubters' stance.
This means that NOT wearing masks is better, as they DO NOT WORK.
What they believe in is NOT science. It is something else. They just wanna call it science, and hope we will believe them. Of course, we use our own discretion, which has them REEEeee-ing.
The headline reads: scientific review confirms doubters' stance.
This means that NOT wearing masks is better, as they DO NOT WORK.
What they believe in is NOT science. It is something else. They just wanna call it science, and hope we will believe them. Of course, we use our own discretion, which has them REEEeee-ing.
I understand it “proves” our point. My point is the notion I should care is flawed. I was not waiting for “science” to “prove” anything.
I understand what you are saying.